BACKGROUND: The quantification of rejection treatment efficacy has been insufficient using traditional markers due in part to lagging response of serum creatinine and histologic alterations on biopsy. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a molecular marker of injury that may assess allograft injury following rejection. METHODS: Retrospective review of the DART study identified 70 patients who had a clinically indicated biopsy, simultaneous dd-cfDNA measurement and at least one follow-up dd-cfDNA within 3 months post-treatment. Thirty-five patients had no biopsy-proven rejection and no rejection treatment (NR), 16 patients had no biopsy-proven rejection but did receive rejection treatment (CR), 9 patients had diagnosis of ABMR/mixed rejection on biopsy and received rejection treatment (ABMR) and 10 patients had diagnosis of TCMR and received rejection treatment (TCMR). The CR, ABMR and TCMR groups combined to form a rejection (R) group. RESULTS: In the R group, dd-cfDNA at diagnosis was 0.62% and 0.35% after 1 month (P = 0.338); 0.77% and 0.21% after 2-3 months (P = 0.002). In TCMR, dd-cfDNA at diagnosis was 1.13% and 0.37% after 1 month (P = 0.625); 0.25% and 0.12% (P = 0.004) after 2-3 months. In ABMR, dd-cfDNA at diagnosis was 1.61% and 1.20% after 1 month (P = 1.000); 3.85% and 1.32% after 2-3 months (P = 0.094). In CR, dd-cfDNA at diagnosis was 0.31% and 0.29% (P = 0.375) after 1 month; 0.38% and 0.17% after 2-3 months (P = 0.313). Lastly, in NR, dd-cfDNA at the index visit was 0.21% and 0.18% after 1 month (P = 0.097); 0.33% and 0.17% after 2-3 months (P = 0.003). Changes in serum creatinine across 1 month and 2-3 months following rejection were similar. CONCLUSIONS: dd-cfDNA may be a useful dynamic biomarker to assess the health of the kidney allograft following rejection treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.