Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare but lethal adenocarcinoma with cholangiocyte differentiation that arises within the biliary tree at variable locations. Curative options are available in the form of surgical resection and/or liver transplantation (LT) in early stage CCA; however, these are offered to a small fraction of patients as they are usually asymptomatic and remain undiagnosed. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a well-known risk factor of CCA, and cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, and metabolic syndrome are recently identified as risk factors of CCA. This emerging evidence places hepatologists in a vital position to diagnose, prognosticate, and manage CCA by planning treatment of each individual patient based on the stage and extent of malignancy. With appropriate selection of patients and the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, surgical resection of localized CCA, LT coupled with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for perihilar CCA, or locoregional or systemic chemotherapy and/or endoscopic interventions for advanced CCA can be offered.

Background and study aims The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on gastroenterology training programs. We aimed to objectively evaluate procedural training volume and impact of COVID-19 on gastroenterology fellowship programs in the United States. Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter study. Procedure volume data on upper and lower endoscopies performed by gastroenterology fellows was abstracted directly from the electronic medical record. The study period was stratified into 2 time periods: Study Period 1, SP1 (03/15/2020 to 06/30/2020) and Study Period 2, SP2 (07/01/2020 to 12/15/2020). Procedure volumes during SP1 and SP2 were compared to Historic Period 1 (HP1) (03/15/2019 to 06/30/2019) and Historic Period 2 (HP2) (07/01/2019 to 12/15/2019) as historical reference. Results Data from 23 gastroenterology fellowship programs (total procedures = 127,958) with a median of 284 fellows (range 273–289; representing 17.8 % of all trainees in the United States) were collected. Compared to HP1, fellows performed 53.6 % less procedures in SP1 (total volume: 28,808 vs 13,378; mean 105.52 ± 71.94 vs 47.61 ± 41.43 per fellow; P < 0.0001). This reduction was significant across all three training years and for both lower and upper endoscopies (P < 0.0001). However, the reduction in volume was more pronounced for lower endoscopy compared to upper endoscopy [59.03 % (95 % CI: 58.2–59.86) vs 48.75 % (95 % CI: 47.96–49.54); P < 0.0001]. The procedure volume in SP2 returned to near baseline of HP2 (total volume: 42,497 vs 43,275; mean 147.05 ± 96.36 vs 150.78 ± 99.67; P = 0.65). Conclusions Although there was a significant reduction in fellows’ endoscopy volume in the initial stages of the pandemic, adaptive mechanisms have resulted in a return of procedure volume to near baseline without ongoing impact on endoscopy training.

No abstract

Doppler measurement provides information on the hemodynamics in the hepatic artery and the portal venous system. Aim: To study the hepatic artery hemodynamics in children with extra hepatic portal vein obstruction. Materials and methods: Hepatic artery indices were studied using Doppler indices in 15 children (<12 years) with extra hepatic portal hypertension (EHPVO) and obliterated esophageal varices. The hepatic artery resistive index, the arterial acceleration time and the acceleration index were used to determine the flow pattern within the hepatic artery. Controls were 15 healthy age-sex matched children, belonging to the same socioeconomic strata in absence of liver disease. Results: The mean age of the children was 8.43 ± 3.2 years and male female ratio was 4:1. All the children had obliterated esophageal varices. The hepatic artery resistive index in the children with EHPVO was normal and similar to controls. The hepatic arterial early systolic acceleration index was significantly higher in cases compared to controls (436 ± 290 vs 214 ± 100; P value <0.004). The hepatic arterial acceleration time though low in the cases (86 ± 35 cm/s) was not statistically different from the controls (128 ± 14 cm/s). Conclusion: There was a significant increase in hepatic arterial early systolic acceleration in children with chronic EHPVO. The latter may be responsible for an increase in hepatic arterial in flow velocity in a slow flow system despite a normal resistive index. Congestive index and venous pulsatility index in the portal vein, both in adult and pediatric patients are determinants of the hemodynamic status of the portal system. 8,9These indices are not reliable in portal vein thrombosis and portal cavernoma as there is a poor correlation between the size of the portal vein and portal pressure. 7,10 Also, the transformation of the portal vein to a cavernoma makes measurement of these indices difficult.Hepatic artery indices are likely to be more informative 11 under such circumstances. One can get a clue to the hemodynamics of the blood flow in the hepatic artery. Till date, there are no published studies that have reported on hemodynamics in hepatic artery in patients with cavernomatous transformation of the portal vein.McNaughton et al 12 describes the normal hepatic arterial waveform in the hepatic artery to be pulsatile with low resistance. The peak height of the wave corresponds to the peak systolic velocity (V 1 ), and the trough to enddiastolic velocity (V 2 ) The normal resistive index (RI) within the hepatic artery ranges from 0.55 to 0.8. Any measured RI above or below the normal range represents a disease state. 13-15The aim of the present study was to determine the hepatic artery resistive index, the acceleration time and the acceleration index in children with EHPVO. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe Liver Unit at Stanley Hospital predominantly caters to the adult population. The present study included 15 children with EHPVO who were referred to the Liver Clinic for management of variceal bleed. All these...

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration is very effective for providing specimens for cytological evaluation. However, the ability to provide sufficient tissue for histological evaluation has been challenging due to the technical limitations of dedicated core biopsy needles. Recently, a modified EUS needle has been introduced to obtain tissue core samples for histological analysis. We aimed to determine (1) its ability to obtain specimens for histological assessment and (2) the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using this needle. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of FNB using modified EUS needles for 342 lesions in 303 patients. The cytology and histological specimens were analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results: Adequate cytological and histological assessment was possible in 293/342 (86%) and 264/342 (77%) lesions, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of the cytological specimen was 294/342 (86%) versus 254/342 (74%) for the histological specimen (p<0.01). Diagnostic accuracy of the combined cytological and histological assessment was 323/342 (94.4%), which was significantly higher than that of both histology alone (p<0.001) and cytology alone (p=0.001). Conclusions: EUS-FNB with the modified EUS needle provided histologic tissue cores in the majority of cases and achieved excellent diagnostic accuracy with few needle passes.