BACKGROUND AND AIMS Intravitreal administration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors is the treatment of a wide variety of retinal diseases. Kidney damage caused by systemic administration is widely known. However, there is not enough information in the literature on the renal effect of these drugs after intravitreal injection. The aim of the study is to analyse the effect of intravitreal anti-VEGF on kidney function in diabetic patients. METHOD A prospective cohort study of diabetic patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received intravitreal anti-VEGF from January 2018 to December 2019. Clinical and analytical parameters were analysed. The follow-up time was 24 months. RESULTS We included 45 patients (55.6% male) with a mean age of 74.4 ± 11.5 (50–91) years. Approximately 64.4% of patients had CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min]. The types of anti-VEGF used were: bevacizumab 57.8% and ranibizumab 42.2%. The average number of doses administered was 7.6 ± 4.8 (1–22). The initial eGFR was 48.7 ± 25.3 mL/min and the Alb/Cr ratio 145 (49.45) mg/g. A significant decrease in the eGFR was observed at 6, 12 and 24 months (Table 1). There was a significant increase in proteinuria at 12 and 24 months. This drop in eGFR was independent of the presence of CKD, the anti-VEGF type or the number of doses. After the admistration of the first dose, five patients (17.2%) in the CKD group required renal replacement therapy (mean time 22 ± 12 months). CONCLUSION A significant decrease in eGFR and an increase in proteinuria are observed after administration of anti-VEGF in diabetic patients. For this reason, a close monitoring of renal function is needed to establish an early diagnosis and management of possible complications.

BackgroundThe current definition of chronic kidney disease applied to patients over the age of 80 has increased the number of referrals to Nephrology. However not all of these patients may benefit from its assessment. This study aims to analyze the evolution of ≥80 years old patients referred to Nephrology.MethodsSingle-center study including patients ≥80 years old with eGFR <60 mL/min/1,73m2 who were referred to Nephrology consultation for the first time. Clinical and analytical parameters were collected retrospectively 12 months before the visit, and prospectively at baseline, and 12 and 24 months after the initial visit. We divided patients into two groups based on annual eGFR loss: progressors (>5 mL/min/1.73m2) and non-progressors (≤5 mL/min/1,73m2).ResultsA total of 318 patients were included, mean age was 84,9 ± 4 (80-97) years. Baseline serum creatinine was 1,65 ± 0,62 mg/dL, eGRF 35 (28-42) mL/min/1,73, and albumin/creatinine ratio 36 (7-229) mg/g. 55,7% of the patients met the definition of progressor at baseline (initial-progressors), 26,3% were progressors after a 12-month follow-up and 13,4% after 24 months. 21,2% and 11,4% of initial-progressors met this definition at 12 and 24 month follow up. The main risk factor for progression was albuminuria. No relationship was found between the nephrologist intervention and the evolution of renal function among initial non-progressors.ConclusionElderly patients who have stable renal function at the time of referral will continue to have stable renal function over the subsequent 24 months and thus may not need to be referred to a nephrologist.

We discuss the use of urine electrolytes and urine osmolality in the clinical diagnosis of patients with fluid, electrolytes, and acid-base disorders, emphasizing their physiological basis, their utility, and the caveats and limitations in their use. While our focus is on information obtained from measurements in the urine, clinical diagnosis in these patients must integrate information obtained from the history, the physical examination, and other laboratory data.

No abstract

No abstract