The purpose of this study was to compare bone promotion around implants which were augmented with ePTFE membranes alone or in combination with cortical demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDB) or the combination of platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF) and insulin like growth factor I (PDGF/IGF-I). Membranes were placed over titanium implants which had been inserted into fresh extraction sockets with large buccal dehiscences. Twenty-four implants were placed in 4 dogs. At 18 weeks clinical bone height measurements were taken, the animals were sacrificed, and all specimens retrieved for histologic evaluation. Clinically, a significant gain in bone levels was present in both the ePTFE membrane alone group (P < 0.005) and PTFE plus PDGF/IGF-I group (P < 0.01), but not in the PTFE plus DFDB group. Results from histometric measurements revealed an approximately 2-fold increase in the percentage of implant surface in contact with bone, area of bone adjacent to the implant surface, and in the total length of the implant surface in contact with bone in the dehiscence defects treated with ePTFE plus PDGF/IGF-I compared to the defects receiving ePTFE membranes alone (each P < 0.05). The response to the DFDB was highly variable and it did not significantly improve the efficacy of the PTFE membranes for any parameter measured. The distance from the outer surface of the new bone to the implant surface was statistically significant for ePTFE membranes alone and membranes plus PDGF/IGF-I. The results demonstrated that clinically, ePTFE membranes alone or ePTFE membranes with PDGF/IGF-I were equally effective in promoting bone growth around the implants. Histologic measurements demonstrated that sites treated with ePTFE membranes plus PDGF/IGF-I had the highest bone density compared with sites which received ePTFE membranes alone or with ePTFE membranes and DFDB. The results of this study question the use of DFDB and support the use of ePTFE membranes alone or with PDG-F-BB/IGF-I as potential methods of promoting bone formation around dental implants.

This study examined histologic and histometric responses to 2 bioabsorbable membranes made from a synthetic copolymer of glycolide and lactide. They were tested for their biocompatibility, resorption characteristics, and ability to support periodontal regeneration. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) was used as control. Nine fox hound dogs with no periodontal disease were used. They were sedated and their teeth thoroughly scaled and root planed. Plaque control was maintained. Two weeks later, each dog was anesthetized using gas anesthesia. Buccal and lingual mucoperiosteal flaps were reflected in the mandibular premolar areas. Randomly selected, buccal alveolar bone was reduced on the 2nd and 4th premolars to a level 5 to 8 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction creating a Class II buccal furcation defect on one quadrant, while the other quadrant received a Class II buccal defect only on the 4th premolar. Root surfaces were denuded of periodontal ligament and cementum, and notches were placed at the bone level of each root. In one quadrant, one site received Type I membrane and the other site received Type II. The contralateral quadrant received ePTFE. Flaps were positioned slightly coronally and sutured. Sutures were removed 1 week later. One month after surgery, 3 dogs were sacrificed and ePTFE barriers were removed from the remaining 6 dogs. Of these, 3 were sacrificed 3 months after surgery and the other 3 at 6 months. Undemineralized experimental tissues were embedded in methylmethacrylate and 8 to 10 microns thick sections were cut in a bucco-lingual direction throughout the mesiodistal extension of the tooth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The formation of even considerable amounts of bone following vertical ridge augmentation with GBR and implants was not accompanied by predictable osseointegration of the implants.

Biofuel quality control involves the determination of metal and metalloid content.

No abstract