The glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor is a promising target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, and there is great interest in characterizing the pharmacology of the GLP-1 receptor and its ligands. In the present report, we have applied bioluminescence resonance energy transfer 2 assays to measure agonist-induced recruitment of ␤arrestins and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 2 to the GLP-1 receptor in addition to traditional measurements of second messenger generation. The peptide hormone oxyntomodulin is described in the literature as a full agonist on the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors. Surprisingly, despite being full agonists in GLP-1 receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation, oxyntomodulin and glucagon were observed to be partial agonists in recruiting ␤arrestins and GRK2 to the GLP-1 receptor. We suggest that oxyntomodulin and glucagon are biased ligands on the GLP-1 receptor.

Much evidence indicates that, during activation of seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors, the intracellular segments of the transmembrane helices (TMs) move apart with large amplitude, rigid body movements of especially TM-VI and TM-VII. In this study, AspIII:08 (Asp 113 ), the anchor point for monoamine binding in TM-III, was used as the starting point to engineer activating metal ion sites between the extracellular segments of the ␤ 2 -adrenergic receptor. Cu(II) and Zn(II) alone and in complex with aromatic chelators acted as potent (EC 50 decreased to 0.5 M) and efficacious agonists in sites constructed between positions III:08 (Asp or His), VI:16 (preferentially Cys), and/or VII:06 (preferentially Cys). In molecular models built over the backbone conformation of the inactive rhodopsin structure, the heavy atoms that coordinate the metal ion were located too far away from each other to form high affinity metal ion sites in both the bidentate and potential tridentate settings. This indicates that the residues involved in the main ligand-binding pocket will have to move closer to each other during receptor activation. On the basis of the distance constraints from these activating metal ion sites, we propose a global toggle switch mechanism for 7TM receptor activation in which inward movement of the extracellular segments of especially TM-VI and, to some extent, TM-VII is coupled to the well established outward movement of the intracellular segments of these helices. We suggest that the pivots for these vertical seesaw movements are the highly conserved proline bends of the involved helices. Seven-transmembrane (7TM)2 receptors, which couple through G proteins but also through a number of G protein-independent signaling pathways such as arrestin-mediated kinase activation, constitute the largest family of proteins in the human genome (1-3). These receptors are activated by basically all kinds of chemical messengers in the body, and they act as chemosensors for a multitude of external chemical signals. 7TM receptors are also the target for the majority of drugs, which, however, address only a small fraction of the receptor repertoire (4). Because they are involved as regulators of key physiological functions throughout the body, 7TM receptors are one of the major focus areas of the pharmaceutical industry (4, 5).7TM receptors are activated by agonists that span a chemical diversity range from large glycoprotein hormones over neuropeptides, lipid messengers, and nucleotides to small monoamines, amino acids, and even metal ions such as calcium (1-3). Notably, although there apparently is no common "lock" for all these chemically highly diverse "keys" (6), it is nevertheless expected that there is a common molecular activation mechanism for 7TM receptors as such. The conformational changes that accompany receptor activation have been characterized in rather great detail for the intracellular segments of the seven-helix bundle (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). This has been achieved through a number of different biochemi...

This study has focused on enhancing the signal generated from the interaction between a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and beta-arrestin 2 (beta-arr2), measured by the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) technology. Both class A (beta(2)-adrenergic receptor [beta(2)-AR]) and class B (neurokinin-type 1 receptor [NK1-R]) GPCRs, classified based on their internalization characteristics, have been analyzed. It was evaluated whether the BRET(2) signal can be enhanced by using (1) beta-arr2 phosphorylation-independent mutant (beta-arr2 R169E) and (2) beta-arr2 mutants deficient in their ability to interact with the components of the clathrin-coated vesicles (beta-arr2 R393E, R395E and beta-arr2 373 stop). For the class B receptor, there was no major difference in the agonist-promoted BRET(2) signal when comparing results obtained with wild-type (wt) and mutant beta-arr2. However, with the class A receptor, a more than 2-fold increase in the BRET(2) signal was observed with beta-arr2 mutants lacking the AP-2 or both AP-2 and clathrin binding sites. This set of data suggests that the inability of these beta-arr2 mutants to interact with the components of the clathrin-coated vesicle probably prevents their rapid dissociation from the receptor, thus yielding an increased and more stable BRET(2) signal. The beta-arr2 R393E, R395E mutant also enhanced the signal window with other members of the GPCR family (neuropeptide Y type 2 receptor [NPY2-R] and TG1019 receptor) and was successfully applied in full-plate BRET(2)-based agonist and antagonist screening assays.

To dissect the interaction between beta-arrestin ((beta)arr) and family B G protein-coupled receptors, we constructed fusion proteins between the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor and (beta)arr2. The fusion constructs had an increase in apparent affinity selectively for glucagon, suggesting that (beta)arr2 interaction locks the receptor in a high-affinity conformation, which can be explored by some, but not all, ligands. The fusion constructs adopted a signaling phenotype governed by the tethered (beta)arr2 with an attenuated G protein-mediated cAMP signal and a higher maximal internalization compared with wild-type receptors. This distinct phenotype of the fusion proteins can not be mimicked by coexpressing wild-type receptor with (beta)arr2. However, when the wild-type receptor was coexpressed with both (beta)arr2 and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5, a phenotype similar to that observed for the fusion constructs was observed. We conclude that the glucagon-like peptide 1 fusion construct mimics the natural interaction of the receptor with (beta)arr2 with respect to binding peptide ligands, G protein-mediated signaling and internalization, and that this distinct molecular phenotype is reminiscent of that which has previously been characterized for family A G protein-coupled receptors, suggesting similarities in the effect of (beta)arr interaction between family A and B receptors also at the molecular level.

Members of the family of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) can catalyze the hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to inosine and thereby change the sequence of specific mRNAs with highly double-stranded structures. The ADARs all contain one or more repeats of the double-stranded RNA binding motif (DRBM). By both in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that the DRBMs of rat ADAR2 are necessary and sufficient for dimerization of the enzyme. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) demonstrates that ADAR2 also exists as dimers in living mammalian cells and that mutation of DRBM1 lowers the dimerization affinity while mutation of DRBM2 does not. Nonetheless, the editing efficiency of the GluR2 Q/R site depends on a functional DRBM2. The ADAR2 DRBMs thus serve differential roles in RNA dimerization and GluR2 Q/R editing, and we propose a model for RNA editing that incorporates the new findings.