Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia membuat pemerintah memberlakukan sejumlah kebijakan, salah satunya bekerja dari rumah (work from home/WFH). WFH bagi pekerja di Indonesia masih menjadi sesuatu yang asing, sehingga sulit menempatkan urusan pekerjaan dan keluarga sesuai dengan kebutuhan. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaruh bekerja dari rumah dengan work-family conflict dan akan melihat pula bagaimana work-family culture berpengaruh terhadap work-family conflict dengan menggunakan metode kuantitatif melalui survei. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bekerja dari rumah menyebabkan work-family conflict, serta work-family culture berpengaruh terhadap work-family conflict. Karena adanya pengaruh inilah, maka organisasi disarankan menerapkan work-family culture yang mendukung pekerjaan pegawainya, sehingga tingkat work-family conflict tidak menjadi lebih tinggi.    The Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia has forced the government to implement many policies, one of which is working from home (WFH). Working from home is still an uncommon concept in Indonesia, so it is difficult for workers to place between work and family matters. This study discusses the effect of working from home with work-family conflict and will also see how work-family culture affects work-family conflict using quantitative methods through surveys. The results show that working from home causes work-family conflict, and work-family culture affects work-family conflict. Because of this influence, it is recommended that organizations implement a work-family culture that supports their employees’ work so that work-family conflicts do not become higher.

The new Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana/KUHP) passage on December 6, 2022, sparked a significant conversation on Twitter, with pro and con responses making it a trending topic. Among these responses, certain influential actors disseminated messages that had the potential to shape public opinion, even if the information was not always accurate. This research utilizes social network theory to map the conversations surrounding netizens’ reactions to the new Criminal Code ratification on social media platforms. The study employs descriptive social network analysis methods to analyze three key variables: network structure, groups, and actors. Data was collected using NodeXL Pro between December 6 to December 10, 2022. The findings revealed that although the network consisted of 25,245 actors and 59,396 relationships, the level of interconnectivity among actors was relatively loose, indicating weaker and mostly one-way relationships. Furthermore, influential actors came from diverse backgrounds and profiles. This research confirms the ability of social media platforms to connect individuals without physical face-to-face interactions. At the group level, discussions regarding the new Criminal Code were divided into various topics, highlighting different perspectives and opinions. The presence of diverse actors reflects the inclusive nature of the network, exemplifying the concept of digital opinion movements and the emergence of digital public spaces. Although the public protests did not change the government’s decision, the conversations among netizens regarding the new Criminal Code raised public awareness of national issues, a crucial aspect of digital democracy.