This research introduces a dual design proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller architecture process that aims to improve system performance by reducing overshoot and conserving electrical energy. The dual design PID controller uses real-time error and one-time step delay to adjust the confidence weights of the controller, leading to improved performance in reducing overshoot and saving electrical energy. To evaluate the effectiveness of the dual design PID controller, experiments were conducted to compare it with the PID controller using least overshoot tuning by Chien–Hrones–Reswick (CHR)  technique. The results showed that the dual design PID controller was more effective at reducing overshoot and saving electrical energy. A case study was also conducted as part of this research, and it demonstrated that the system performed better when using the dual design PID controller. Overshoot and electrical energy consumption are common issues in systems that can impact performance, and the dual design PID controller architecture process provides a solution to these issues by reducing overshoot and saving electrical energy. The dual design PID controller offers a new technique for addressing these issues and improving system performance. In summary, this research presents a new technique for addressing overshoot and electrical energy consumption in systems through the use of a dual design PID controller. The dual design PID controller architecture process was found to be an effective solution for reducing overshoot and saving electrical energy in systems, as demonstrated by the experiments and case study conducted as part of this research. The dual design PID controller presents a promising solution for improving system performance by addressing the issues of overshoot and electrical energy consumption.

This study evaluates the performance of three control systems, namely the root locus method, type-1 Mamdani fuzzy logic system (FLS), and interval type-2 Mamdani FLS, in noise-free and noisy ball and beam systems. The main contribution of this study is enabling improved design and implementation of control systems in real-world applications by offering a comprehensive understanding of each control system's performance. The methodology involves conducting four tests focusing on various input types, including a 0.8-meter step input and sine wave function, and assessing the presence of noise in the system. The performance of each control system is analyzed using parameters such as rise time, setting time, and percentage overshoot, with the interval type-2 Mamdani FLS further examined by varying footprint of uncertainty values. Results from noise-free tests reveal that the root locus method has shorter rise and setting times, but a higher percentage overshoot compared to the type-1 Mamdani FLS and type-2 Mamdani FLS. In noisy environments, the type-2 Mamdani FLS with varying Footprint of Uncertainty values outperforms the type-1 Mamdani FLS with reduced rise time, setting time, and percentage overshoot. The root locus method shows a significantly higher percentage overshoot in noisy conditions compared to the other two control systems. In conclusion, the type-2 Mamdani FLS control system demonstrates superior capability under changing conditions compared to the type-1 Mamdani FLS, with its performance varying based on footprint of uncertainty values. This study highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate control system depending on specific needs and environmental factors.

No abstract

No abstract