Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a pulmonary valve autograft (PVA) was first reported by Donald N. Ross (DNR) in 1967. The expectation of this procedure was to avoid degenerative changes seen in other biological tissue valves such as calcification, attenuation, and rupture of the leaflets. Recent reports by the original investigator's group have confirmed the lack of degenerative changes in PVA. To corroborate their conclusions, the fate of 12 patients undergoing AVR with PVA by one of us (LGL) has been ascertained. From March 1969 to June 1971, 12 patients underwent AVR with PVA. The right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) was reconstructed with an aortic homograft valved conduit. The mean age was 42.7 years (range 21 to 52 years). The mean follow-up for 11 hospital survivors is 12.4 years. Three PVA have been replaced; one following infective endocarditis at 13 years, and two at 15 and 73 months due to technical malalignment. There was no evidence of PVA degeneration during histological examination of these explanted PVAs. Six patients are alive and retain the original PVA at 12 years (55%). This analysis corroborates the conclusions of the DNR report and strongly suggests an immunological mechanism in the process of calcification of other biological tissue valves. The Ross operation is advocated for AVR in young patients as valve durability is of paramount importance especially in this group.
Aortobronchial fistula (ABF) is a rare complication of aortic repair seen with both surgical and endovascular manipulation. The available literature largely refers to the need for surgical repair. We are not aware of any reports of endovascular repair after the Bentall procedure. This report describes a patient who after the Bentall procedure presented with massive hemoptysis from ABF, a multidisciplinary team decided on endovascular repair due to patient frailty to avoid redo sternotomy. We believe this is the first case report of endovascular repair and represents the success of multidisciplinary collaboration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.