BACKGROUND Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor, demonstrated encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies in previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in renal cell carcinoma after prior treatment. METHODS Eight hundred twenty-one patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma previously treated with one or two antiangiogenic therapies were randomized (1:1) to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks or everolimus 10-mg tablet orally once daily. Primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included objective response rate and safety. RESULTS Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) overall survival was 25.0 months (21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for risk of death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.0018), meeting the predefined criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). Objective response rate was greater with nivolumab (25%) than everolimus (5%; odds ratio 5.98; 95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72; P<0.001). Median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 4.6 months (3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% (nivolumab) and 37% (everolimus) of patients; most common was fatigue (3%) with nivolumab and anemia (8%) with everolimus. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred for nivolumab versus everolimus in treatment-experienced patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01668784

BACKGROUND Nivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma. METHODS We randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk. RESULTS A total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follow-up of 25.2 months in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, the 18-month overall survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 78) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 60% (95% CI, 55 to 65) with sunitinib; the median overall survival was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 26.0 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 42% versus 27% (P<0.001), and the complete response rate was 9% versus 1%. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.82; P = 0.03, not significant per the prespecified 0.009 threshold). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 509 of 547 patients (93%) in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 521 of 535 patients (97%) in the sunitinib group; grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 250 patients (46%) and 335 patients (63%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 22% and 12% of the patients in the respective groups. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate- and poor-risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 214 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02231749.)

No abstract

Summary Background Metastatic DNA mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a poor prognosis following conventional chemotherapy and exhibits high levels of tumour neoantigens, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, and checkpoint regulators, all features that correspond with response to programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) blockade in other tumour types. Thus, nivolumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, was evaluated in this population. Methods In this is ongoing, multicentre, open-label, nonrandomised, phase 2 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed recurrent or mCRC locally assessed as dMMR/MSI-H who had progressed on/after or been intolerant of at least one prior line of treatment, including a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin or irinotecan, were enrolled. Patients were given nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from study. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1·1. All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the primary and safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02060188. Findings Among the 74 patients who were enrolled between March 12, 2014, and March 16, 2016, most (54·1%) had received ≥3 prior therapies. At a median follow-up of 12·0 months (interquartile range 8·57–18·00 months), 23 of 74 patients (31·1% [95% CI 20·8%–42·9%]) achieved an investigator-assessed objective response; 68·9% (95% CI 57·1%–79·2%) of patients had disease control for ≥12 weeks. Median duration of response was not yet reached; all responders were alive, and 8 (34·8%) had responses of ≥12 months. The most common (≥10% of patients) drug-related adverse events was fatigue (n=16 [21·6%]), diarrhoea (n=15 [20·3%]), pruritus (n=10 [13·5%]) and rash (n=8 [10·8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were increased lipase (n=6 [8·1%]) and amylase (n=2 [2·7%]) levels. Five patients (6·8%) discontinued treatment because of increased alanine aminotransferase, colitis, duodenal ulcer, acute kidney injury, and stomatitis (n=1 each). Twenty-three patients (31·1%) died during the study; none of these deaths was considered to be treatment related by the investigator. Interpretation Nivolumab provided durable responses and disease control, as well as long-term survival in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, and is a new treatment option for these patients.