BackgroundIn addition to governmental regulation and scientific advancements, the World Health Organization requires extensive review of local opinions before initiating clinical trials of xenotransplantation (XTx). The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of health care providers and patients regarding XTx.MethodsAn anonymous Likert-scale survey regarding attitudes toward XTx was distributed to pre- and post-kidney transplant patients, nephrologists, transplant surgeons, and nurses (“providers”). Patient and provider responses were described and compared. Regression analysis using patients’ responses was performed to identify factors associated with XTx acceptance.ResultsEighty percent (32/40) of providers and 69% (113/163) of patients were agreeable to clinical XTx if the risks and results were likely to be similar to kidney allotransplantation (P<0.05). Kidney providers rated the influence of religious beliefs in medical decisions (45% versus 15%) and genetic engineering (43% versus 25%) as being more important than did patients (P<0.05). A small proportion in both groups (<15%) reported concerns about (1) potential personality changes, (2) how others would interact, (3) a perception of being “less human,” or (4) morals or ethics. Logistic regression found that the odds of patients accepting XTx were greater if they had no religious concerns (OR, 25.10; 95% CI, 2.59 to 243.00), but acceptance was less likely if they were not willing to use XTx as a bridge to allotransplantation (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.70).Conclusions(1) If outcomes were similar to allotransplantation, XTx support was strong among both providers and patients; (2) providers overestimated the influence of religious beliefs and genetic engineering on patient medical decisions, although religious beliefs are associated with XTx acceptance; (3) XTx use as a bridge to allotransplant was associated with XTx acceptance; and (4) psychosocial concerns were low for either group. Future studies among other communities are warranted to assess if similar attitudes exist.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses broad challenges to healthcare systems and providers. The manifestations of this disease are still being described in a variety of different contexts and patient populations.Results: We report the case of a neonate who demonstrated COVID-19 after surgical correction of transposition of the great arteries. In addition, the patient demonstrated an evolving and persistent tachyarrhythmia consistent with neither the most likely postoperative complications nor typical COVID-19.Discussion: The patient had negative preoperative testing for the virus and presented with profound oxygen desaturation and respiratory failure several days postoperatively. This raised concern for a complication of his arterial switch operation. It was found that one of the patient's caregivers was an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19, and imaging ruled out intracardiac shunting. After initiating treatment for COVID-19, the patient's oxygen requirements and need for antiarrhythmic agents improved. Conclusion:We propose that, despite negative preoperative testing, coronavirus infection may present as refractory tachyarrhythmia, and may be considered along with surgical complications as a cause for unexplained hypoxemia postoperatively.

After the U.S. Caribbean 2017 hurricanes, rebuilding, strengthening, and sustaining essential environmental health (EH) services and systems were critical. The National Environmental Health Association, in partnership with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), developed an online mentorship program for both newly hired and existing environmental health staff, as well as health department leadership in the Caribbean health departments. Participants were provided both practical and didactic learning and were given the opportunity to evaluate the program. Both mentors and mentees were highly satisfied with the knowledge and skills acquired, and mentees expressed it was relevant to their daily work. Based on the findings, we recommend both an online and a hybrid mentorship program be considered for leadership- and inspector-level workforces in EH and potentially other fields.