Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is often misdiagnosed as supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram remains a key diagnostic tool to differentiate them while providing insights to aid localization of VT. The use of Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) in terminating VT is not conventionally recommended due to lack of robust evidence of its effectiveness and poor understanding of its mechanism in terminating VT. Case summary A 74-year-old man with history of ischaemic heart disease was admitted with broad complex tachycardia. VT-1 was diagnosed following failed tachycardia termination by adenosine. Haemodynamic compromise necessitated synchronized cardioversion with successful reversion. However, a different VT-2 occurred after cardioversion. VM led to successful termination of VT-2. Subsequently, recurrent episodes of VT-2 occurred with consistent termination by VM. Transthoracic echocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and a coronary angiogram were performed. Findings suggested that these are likely scar-related VT. VT-1 originated from an anteroseptal scar, whilst VT-2, responsive to VM, likely originated from the Purkinje fibres. Patient remained eurhythmic after Day 1 following amiodarone and beta-blocker initiation. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted prior to discharge. Discussion VM is one of the vagal manoeuvres which are commonly used as initial management of supraventricular tachycardia. Its role in management of VT is obscure. Anecdotal case series recorded its successful use for managing particular VT. Exact mechanism remains elusive although postulated to involve change in cardiac size during strain and release of acetylcholine.

Background Acutely painful lower limb is a common presentation to the emergency department, and acute compartment syndrome is an important differential diagnosis to consider given the correct predisposing history and clinical presentation. However, idiopathic spontaneous compartment syndrome is an uncommon occurrence. Case presentation A 54-year-old Caucasian man with no previous comorbidities presented with acute right-sided lower limb pain with classical symptoms showing gradual evolution. He had no other history of medical relevance and no preceding injury. Examination showed a marginally enlarged right lower limb with stretched skin and tenderness. Routine blood tests were normal including D-dimer levels. However, in the absence of any underlying risk factors, acute compartment syndrome was suspected on clinical merit and confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging. He underwent successful surgical intervention with fasciotomy and achieved good recovery. Discussion Acute compartment syndrome, though commonly attributed to trauma, can occur due to varied causes. Spontaneous acute compartment syndrome is attributed to diabetes mellitus. Idiopathic acute spontaneous compartment syndrome occurs in the absence of either intrinsic or extrinsic risk factors and is rarely documented in the literature. This case highlights the importance of appreciating classical clinical signs and having the clinical acumen to consider an obvious diagnosis even in its rarer form of presentation.

Background Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries presenting with ST-segment elevation can be challenging. Understanding the cardiac and non-cardiac causes aid in identifying the underlying diagnosis and deciding on the management. Neurological insult resulting in a mismatch of oxygen supply or demand to cardiomyocytes can lead to type 2 MI. Acute brain injury, such as intracranial haemorrhage, can induce cardiac dysfunction secondary to brain–heart interaction via hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and catecholamine surge. Case summary A 50-year-old Caucasian male who vaped cannabis presented with epileptic seizures. A Glasgow coma scale of 7/15 necessitated urgent intubation. Electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation in inferior leads. Computed tomography of the head suggested intracerebral haemorrhage. He was stabilized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Subsequent imaging confirmed anterior communicating cerebral artery aneurysm and haematoma. Echocardiogram showed severe left ventricular dysfunction and hypokinesia in the left circumflex (LCx) territory. After step down from ICU, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed transmural MI and myocardial oedema at LCx territory. Coronary angiogram was normal. Patient was treated with Levetiracetam and heart failure regimen. A cardiac defibrillator was implanted for secondary prevention and he was scheduled for elective neurosurgical intervention. A follow-up outpatient echocardiogram was normal. Discussion Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries is uncommon. Though the majority is due to either plaque disruption or myocarditis, non-cardiac causes, such as acute neurological insults and substance use, should be considered. Scrutinizing the clinical presentation and using a meticulous approach with appropriate investigations are required to reach the correct diagnosis and appropriate management.