Purpose/Objectives Describe burden, skills preparedness, and QOL for caregivers of patients with NSCLC, and describe how findings informed the development of a caregiver palliative care intervention that aims to reduce caregiver burden, improve caregiving skills, and promote self-care. Design Descriptive, longitudinal. Setting One NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center in Southern California. Sample A total of 163 family members or friends who were 18 years or older and identified by patients as being the caregiver were accrued. Methods All eligible caregivers were approached by advance practice nurses (APNs) during a regularly scheduled patient clinic visit. Informed consent was obtained prior to study participation. Outcome measures were completed at baseline and repeated at 7, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables, and one-way repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test for change over time for all predictor and outcome variables. Main Research Variables Caregiver burden, skills preparedness, psychological distress, and QOL. Findings Caregivers were highly functional. Caregiver burden related to subjective demands increased significantly over time. Perceived skills preparedness was high at baseline, but decreased over time. Psychological distress was moderate but increased over time. Overall QOL was moderate at baseline, and decreased significantly over time. Psychological well-being had the worst QOL score. Conclusions Caregivers experienced high levels of caregiver burden, and report deteriorations in psychological well-being and overall QOL over time. Implications for Nursing Oncology nurses need to ensure that caregivers receive information that supports the caregiving role throughout the cancer trajectory.

Background Family caregivers (FCGs) experience significant deteriorations in quality of life while caring for lung cancer patients. This study tested the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention for FCGs of patients diagnosed with stage I–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods FCGs who were identified by patients as the primary caregiver were enrolled in a prospective, quasi-experimental study whereby the usual care group was accrued first followed by the intervention group. FCGs in the intervention group were presented at interdisciplinary care meetings, and they also received four educational sessions organized in the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual domains. The sessions included self-care plans to support the FCG’s own needs. Caregiver burden, caregiving skills preparedness, psychological distress, and FCG QOL were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks using validated measures. Results A total of 366 FCGs were included in the primary analysis. FCGs who received the interdisciplinary palliative care intervention had significantly better scores for social well-being (5.84 vs. 6.86; p<.001) and lower psychological distress (4.61 vs. 4.20; p=.010) at 12 weeks compared to FCGs in the usual care group. FCGs in the intervention group had significantly less caregiver burden compared to FCGs in the usual care group (p=.008). Conclusions An interdisciplinary approach to palliative care in lung cancer resulted in statistically significant improvements in the FCG’s social well-being, psychological distress, and less caregiver burden.

Objective Family caregivers (FCGs) caring for loved ones with lung cancer are at risk for psychological distress and impaired quality of life (QOL). This study explores the relationship between FCGs’ distress, per the Distress Thermometer (DT), and FCGs’ QOL, burden, and preparedness. The purpose is to identify types of problems unique to FCGs in cancer care. Methods FCGs of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were recruited from an adult outpatient setting at a comprehensive cancer center. Questionnaires included demographic information, City of Hope QOL Scale-Family Version, Caregiver Burden Scale, FCG Preparedness, and DT. Baseline data were utilized for this analysis. Results Of the FCGs (N=163), 68% were spouses, 64% female, and 34% worked full-time. FCG age ranged from 21 to 88 years with a mean of 57 years. FCGs cared for patients with NSCLC stage I-III (44%) and stage IV (56%). Psychological distress (DT mean = 4.40) was moderate. DT scores were highly correlated with seven of the eight explanatory variables. Secondary principal components analysis of the explanatory variables combined correlated variables into three constructs identified as Self Care Component, FCG Role Component, and FCG Stress Component. Simultaneous multiple regression of distress onto the three components showed they accounted for 49% of the variance in distress. Conclusion This exploration of FCGs’ concerns associated with elevated distress scores, as measured by the DT, helped identify three component problem areas. These areas warrant further psychosocial assessment and intervention to support FCGs as they care for the patient with cancer.

Objectives Family caregivers (FCGs) play an important role in the quality of life (QOL) of lung cancer patients. FCGs experience significant psychological distress related to their caregiving role, but there is relatively little data about FCG QOL after cancer surgery. We sought to describe QOL trajectories for patients and their FCGs after lung cancer surgery. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a larger, prospective QOL study, testing the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention for lung cancer patients and FCGs in a single institution. The intervention included interdisciplinary care planning and formal education sessions for both patients and FCGs. This subset analysis included patients who underwent surgery and had a matching FCG with complete QOL data (41 pairs of patients and caregivers out of 112 surgical patients). Patient QOL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung tool. FCG QOL was assessed with the FCG version of the City of Hope QOL tool. Psychological distress was assessed using the Distress Thermometer. Results Psychological distress levels were highest for patients (3.8/10) and FCGs (5.1/10) before surgery. Distress levels decreased among patients at six (2.9/10) and 12 weeks (2.2/10, p = .001) later, but remained elevated among FCGs (4.2/10 and 4.4/10, p = 0.157). Compared with usual care, patients in the intervention group reported improved physical and functional QOL outcomes at 12 weeks (p < .01), but there was no significant benefit seen for FCGs in any domain (p > .05). Conclusions FCGs of lung cancer patients experience significant psychological distress. FCGs continue to have impaired QOL 3 months after surgery. The trajectory of QOL for FCGs does not mirror that of patients. Our palliative care intervention showed improved QOL outcomes for this subset of patients but was not effective for their FCGs. Trial Registration NCI sponsored, trial identifier NCT00823667 https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00823667.

Family caregivers (FCGs) of lung cancer patients face multiple challenges which impact their quality of life and well-being. Whether challenged physically, emotionally, socially or spiritually, distress in one area may compound challenges in other areas. In order to maintain function and health of FCGs as they provide valuable care for the health and well-being of the patient, attention must be given to the needs of FCGs for support and education. The purpose of this article is to describe the multifaceted challenges that FCGs of lung cancer patients experience using case studies selected from a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded Program Project Grant “Palliative Care for Quality of Life and Symptom Concerns in Family Caregivers of Lung Cancer Patients.” The cases are discussed in terms of how the FCG’s quality of life is impacted by the caregiver role as well as how stressors in one or more domains of quality of life compound difficulties in coping with the demands of the role. The importance of the oncology nurse’s assessment of FCGs’ needs for support, education, and self-care through the lung cancer illness trajectory is discussed while presenting accessible community resources to meet those needs.