Oral drug administration has been a popular choice due to patient compliance and limited clinical resources. Orally delivered drugs must circumvent the harsh gastrointestinal (GI) environment to effectively enter the systemic circulation.The GI tract has a number of structural and physiological barriers that limit drug bioavailability including mucus, the tightly regulated epithelial layer, immune cells, and associated vasculature. Nanoparticles have been used to enhance oral bioavailability of drugs, as they can act as a shield to the harsh GI environment and prevent early degradation while also increasing uptake and transport of drugs across the intestinal epithelium. Evidence suggests that different nanoparticle formulations may be transported via different intracellular mechanisms to cross the intestinal epithelium. Despite the existence of a significant body of work on intestinal transport of nanoparticles, many key questions remain: What causes the poor bioavailability of the oral drugs? What factors contribute to the ability of a nanoparticle to cross different intestinal barriers? Do nanoparticle properties such as size and charge influence the type of endocytic pathways taken? In this Review, we summarize the different components of intestinal barriers and the types of nanoparticles developed for oral delivery. In particular, we focus on the various intracellular pathways used in nanoparticle internalization and nanoparticle or cargo translocation across the epithelium. Understanding the gut barrier, nanoparticle characteristics, and transport pathways may lead to the development of more therapeutically useful nanoparticles as drug carriers.

Cell-derived matrices are useful tools for studying the extracellular matrix (ECM) of different cell types and testing the effects on cell migration or wound repair. These matrices typically are generated using extended culture with ascorbic acid to boost ECM production. Applying this technique to cancer cell cultures could advance the study of cancer ECM and its effects on recruitment and training of the tumor microenvironment, but ascorbic acid is potently cytotoxic to cancer cells. Macromolecular crowding agents can also be added to increase matrix deposition based on the excluded volume principle. We report the use of macromolecular crowding (MMC) alone as an effective strategy to generate brain cancer cell-derived matrices for downstream analyses and cell migration studies. We cultured the mouse glioblastoma cell line GL261 for 1 week in the presence of three previously-reported MMC agents (carrageenan, Ficoll 70/400, and hyaluronic acid). We measured the resulting deposition of collagens and sulfated glycosaminoglycans using quantitative assays, as well as other matrix components by immunostaining. Both carrageenan and Ficoll promoted significantly more accumulation of total collagen content, sulfated glycosaminoglycan content, and fibronectin staining. Only Ficoll, however, also demonstrated a significant increase in collagen I staining. The results were more variable in 3D spheroid culture. We focused on Ficoll MMC matrices, which were isolated using the small molecule Raptinal to induce cancer cell apoptosis and matrix decellularization. The cancer cell-derived matrix promoted significantly faster migration of human astrocytes in a scratch wound assay, which may be explained by focal adhesion morphology and an increase in cellular metabolic activity. Ultimately, these data show MMC culture is a useful technique to generate cancer cell-derived matrices and study the effects on stromal cell migration related to wound repair.