Use of Peer Specialists (PSs)—individuals with serious mental illness who use their experiences to help others with serious mental illness—is increasing. However, their impact on patient outcomes has not been demonstrated definitively. This cluster randomized, controlled trial within the Veterans Health Administration compared patients served by three intensive case management teams that each deployed two PSs for one year, to the patients of three similar teams without PSs (Usual Care). All patients (PS group=149, Usual Care=133) had substantial psychiatric inpatient histories and a primary Axis 1 psychiatric disorder. Before and after the year PSs worked, patients were surveyed on their recovery, quality of life, activation (health self-management efficacy), interpersonal relations, and symptoms. Patients in the PS group improved significantly more (z=2.00, df=1, p=0.05) than those receiving Usual Care on activation. There were no other significant differences. PSs helped patients become more active in treatment, which can promote recovery.

Computerized weight management with peer support results in lower weight, and can have greater effectiveness than clinician-led in-person services. This intervention is well received, and could be feasible to disseminate.

Objective: Mobile technologies, such as smartphones, can improve health services by delivering assessments and interventions that reach people in their daily lives. There is, however, disagreement regarding whether people with serious mental illness make meaningful use of mobile technology and whether interventions that rely on mobile technology should be tailored for this population.Methods: At two clinics, 249 people with serious mental illness were interviewed regarding mobile phone use, and their cognitive functioning was assessed.Results: Mobile phones were used by 86% of participants, including 60% who used a smartphone. Phones were used for messaging by 81%, Internet by 52%, e-mail by 46%, and applications by 45%. Individuals who were older, had a persistent psychotic disorder rather than bipolar disorder, received disability income, or had worse neurocognitive functioning were less likely to own a smartphone (x 2 =52.7, p,0.001).Conclusions: Most patients with serious mental illness owned a mobile phone; a majority owned a smartphone. Developers should consider tailoring mobile interventions for psychosis and cognitive deficits.

Objective: This study examines barriers to participation and retention in 2 modalities (web-based and in-person) of a weight-management intervention tailored for individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). Method: Using a mixed-methods approach, we explored the barriers veterans with SMI face when participating in a web-based (WebMOVE) or in-person (MOVE-SMI) version of the same SMI-adapted MOVE weight-management program. Participants in the randomized controlled trial (n = 277) were recruited from specialty mental health clinics at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Barriers were analyzed across treatment condition and program attendance (engagement) at baseline and follow-up using a generalized lineal model. Post hoc analyses assessed whether changes in the trajectory of barriers over time were associated with engagement. A subsample of participants (n = 48) from the WebMOVE and MOVE-SMI treatment conditions completed a qualitative interview, and 2 coders used open coding to analyze the data. Results: Although barriers specific to treatment modality existed, most barriers cut across intervention modality, including financial hardship, lack of reliable housing and transportation, comorbid physical and mental health issues, and competing demands on personal time. Results of post hoc analyses found the association between engagement and emotional and motivational factors to be statistically significant. Conclusions: This study is the 1st to identify barriers in a web-based intervention for SMI. Similar barriers persisted across treatment modalities. Known barriers, particularly socioeconomic barriers, should be addressed to improve engagement and retention of individuals in weight-management interventions adapted for SMI, irrespective of modality.

In mental health care, consumer providers (CPs) are individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) who draw upon their lived experiences while providing services to others with SMI. Implementation of CPs has proven to be challenging in a variety of settings. The PEER project (Peers Enhancing Recovery) involved rolling out CPs using an implementation science model and evaluating implementation and impact in mental health treatment settings (3 intervention, 3 control). In qualitative interviews, facilitators and challenges to implementation were described by the CPs, their team members, clients, and study researchers. Site preparation, external facilitation, and positive, reinforcing experiences with CPs facilitated implementation. Role definitions and deficiencies in CPs’ technical knowledge posed challenges to implementation. Sustainability was not realized due to insufficient resources. However, implementation was positive overall, characterized by Diffusion of Innovation concepts of high relative advantage, strong trialability, compatibility with prevailing norms, compelling observability, and relatively low complexity. By preparing and working systematically with intervention sites to incorporate new services, implementation was strengthened and challenges were minimized.