The patients in this study had elevated BMI and were more likely to be female. This patient population strongly resembles that of patients with IIH, suggesting the possibility that SWA may be a cause of PST in some patients with IIH. Illustrative cases supporting this hypothesis are presented.

4 Laryngoscope, 127:971-976, 2017.

Objective Appropriate timing of subspecialty simulation is critical to maximize learner benefit and guide resource utilization. We aimed to determine optimal timing of a simulation-based curriculum designed to teach entry-level procedural skills for otolaryngology residency. Study Design Simulation curriculum intervention tested among 3 comparison groups of varying clinical levels. Setting Academic otolaryngology training program and medical school. Subjects and Methods We developed a simulation-based technical skills curriculum incorporating the following task trainers: flexible laryngoscopy, peritonsillar abscess drainage, and myringotomy and tube insertion. Preclinical medical students (n = 40), subintern rotators (n = 35), and midyear interns (n = 8) completed the simulation-based curriculum. Pre- and postintervention knowledge/confidence and “level appropriateness” were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and effect size was calculated. Results Overall self-reported knowledge/confidence levels improved in all 3 groups preintervention (1.05, 2.15, 3.17) to postintervention (2.79, 3.45, 4.38, respectively; all P < .01). Preclinical medical students uniformly reported very little to no familiarity with the procedures prior to the curriculum, while interns approached independence following the intervention. Large effect sizes were seen in all tasks for preclinical students ( d = 3.13), subinterns ( d = 1.46), and interns ( d = 2.14). Five-point Likert scale measures of level appropriateness (1 = too challenging, 5 = too easy) for preclinical students, subinterns, and interns were 2.70 (95% CI, 2.56-2.84), 3.11 (95% CI, 2.97-3.25), and 3.75 (95% CI, 3.35-4.15), respectively. Conclusion Subinternship may represent the optimal timing for entry-level skills simulation training. The proposed curriculum shows utility for clinical levels ranging from medical students to postgraduate year 1 resident levels, with large effect sizes for all tested groups.

ObjectiveEvaluate the correlation between Friedman Tongue Position (FTP) and airway cephalometrics in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Study DesignRetrospective review of adult patients with OSA undergoing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).MethodsCollected data included age, sex, body mass index, apnea hypopnea index, FTP, and airway cephalometric parameters. Data analyses were performed using ANOVA, dichotomous t‐testing, and linear regression.Results203 patients were included in the analysis. (M:F 132:71). The mean posterior airway space (PAS) was inversely correlated (p = 0.001, r =.119) with higher FTP grades with means of 12.3 mm, 7.9 mm, 6.6 mm, and 4.3 mm, I‐IV respectively. Minimal cross‐sectional area for patients with FTP I‐IV was 245.7, 179.8, 137.6, and 74.2 mm, 2 respectively (p = 0.002, r = .095). Mean hyoid‐mandibular plane (H‐MP) for FTP I‐IV was 20.6 mm, 20.4 mm, 24.7 mm, and 28.9 mm respectively. No statistically significant difference between H‐MP values when comparing patients with FTP I or II (p = 0.22). There were statistically significant differences when these two groups were individually compared to FTP III and IV (p = 0.002). Linear regression analysis confirmed an independent association between FTP and PAS (β = −2.06, p < 0.001), minimal cross‐sectional area (β = −45.07, p = 0.02), and H‐MP (β = 3.03, p = 0.01) controlling for BMI, age, AHI, and sex.ConclusionsUse of FTP is supported by objective CBCT cephalometric results, in particular the PAS, minimal cross‐sectional area, and H‐MP. Understanding the correlation between objective measurements of retroglossal collapse should allow Otolaryngologists to more confidently select patients who may require surgery to address the retroglossal area, particularly when the ability to perform cephalometric analysis is not possibleLevel of Evidence4.