Formaldehyde (CH2O) and acetaldehyde (C2H4O) are reactive small molecules produced endogenously in cells as well as being environmental contaminants. Both of these small aldehydes are classified as human carcinogens, since they are known to damage DNA and exposure is linked to cancer incidence. However, the mutagenic properties of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde remain incompletely understood, at least in part because they are relatively weak mutagens. Here, we use a highly sensitive yeast genetic reporter system featuring controlled generation of long single-stranded DNA regions to show that both small aldehydes induced mutational patterns characterized by predominantly C/G → A/T, C/G → T/A, and T/A → C/G substitutions, each in similar proportions. We observed an excess of C/G → A/T transversions when compared to mock-treated controls. Many of these C/G → A/T transversions occurred at TC/GA motifs. Interestingly, the formaldehyde mutational pattern resembles single base substitution (SBS) signature 40 from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). SBS40 is a mutational signature of unknown etiology. We also noted that acetaldehyde treatment caused an excess of deletion events longer than four bases while formaldehyde did not. This latter result could be another distinguishing feature between the mutational patterns of these simple aldehydes. These findings shed new light on the characteristics of two important, commonly occurring mutagens.

Formaldehyde (CH2O) and acetaldehyde (C2H4O) are reactive small molecules produced endogenously in cells as well as being environmental contaminants. Both of these small aldehydes are classified as human carcinogens, as they are known to damage DNA and cause mutations. However, the mutagenic properties of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde remain incompletely understood, at least in part because they are relatively weak mutagens. Here, we use a highly sensitive yeast genetic reporter system featuring controlled generation of long single-stranded DNA regions to show that both small aldehydes induced mutational patterns characterized by mostly C/G → A/T, C/G → T/A, and T/A → C/G substitutions, each in similar proportions. We also observed an excess of C/G → A/T transversions when compared to mock-treated controls. Many of these C/G → A/T transversions occurred at TC/GA motifs. Interestingly, the formaldehyde mutational pattern resembles single base substitution (SBS) signature 40 from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). SBS40 is a cancer mutational signature of unknown etiology. We also noted that acetaldehyde treatment caused an excess number of deletion events longer than four bases while formaldehyde did not. This latter result could be a distinguishing feature between the mutational patterns of these two simple aldehydes. These findings shed new light on the mutagenic characteristics of two important carcinogens.

No abstract