Goals/Purpose
Breast implant illness (BII) is a poorly understood heterogeneous disorder treated with implant removal; however, patient-reported symptoms and outcomes following treatment remain unclear.
Methods/Technique
A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral breast implant removal related to BII by two surgeons between 2018-2022 was performed. Patients were surveyed with the BREAST-Q augmentation model with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) BII survey extension. Outcomes were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression adjusting for patient-associated factors.
Results/Complications
Forty-seven patients were surveyed with a response rate of 51% (n=24). Of the 20 patients completing the survey, the majority were Caucasian (85%), with 45% (n=9) having a documented history of psychiatric illness. Six (30%) had capsular contracture and four (20%) had documented implant rupture. The majority of implant removals (n=12, 60%) were not covered by insurance. Fourteen (70%) had a net improvement in their symptoms after implant removal—most commonly improving chest discomfort, muscle pain, fever, and headaches. Self-pay was predictive of increased breast satisfaction scores (p=0.009), but had no impact on symptomatic improvement. Reduced time to implant removal was predictive of fewer residual symptoms (p=0.032). Capsular contracture was predictive of reduced psychosocial, sexual, and breast satisfaction scores (p=0.015). Psychiatric illness had no significant impact on outcomes.
Conclusion
In the setting of suspected or diagnosed BII, reduced time to implant removal may decrease the risk of residual symptoms and improve overall patient satisfaction. In patients with capsular contracture, preoperative counseling should emphasize the fact that implant removal may improve physical symptoms only.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.