Living donor liver transplantation is now a common practice in countries in which the availability of cadaveric organs is limited. The preoperative preparation, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative care of donors and recipients have evolved in recent years. We retrospectively compared 67 donors with a remnant liver volume equal to or more than 30% (group 1) with 14 donors who had less than 30% remnant liver volume (group 2) for donor outcomes. All the complications in donors were systematically classified. Donors with less than 30% remnant liver volume showed significantly higher peak aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, and bilirubin levels. There were 6 complications in group 1 and 4 complications in group 2. The difference between the 2 groups in terms of donor complications did reach statistical significance (P ϭ 0.043); donors with a remnant liver volume Ͻ 30% had a 4 times greater relative risk of morbidity.In conclusion, the use of donors with less than 30% remnant liver volume is highly debatable as donor safety should be of utmost importance in living donor liver transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now an accepted treatment modality for end-stage liver disease. It has become an alternative in the era of organ shortage. This procedure is possible because of the segmental structure of the liver and the regeneration potential of the transplanted and remnant parts. After years of extensive experience in adult-to-child left-lobe liver transplantation, right donor hepatectomy has become a common practice in centers performing adult-to-adult LDLT. Despite impressive results, right-lobe LDLT involves one of the most complicated and technically demanding surgical procedures and has created considerable controversy with respect to donor safety. To date, there have been 17 donor deaths reported, and the morbidity is reported to be in the range of 20% to 30%.

Although it is clear that Doppler US evaluation is an effective choice for diagnosing vascular complications after liver transplantation, we also observed that Doppler US examination plays an important role in detecting vascular complications intraoperatively and improving the patient's chance for a successful outcome.

Summary The harvesting of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with the right lobe graft for living‐donor liver transplantation allows an optimal venous drainage for the recipient; however, it is an extensive operation for the donor. This is a prospective, nonrandomized study evaluating liver functions and early clinical outcome in donors undergoing right hepatectomy with or without MHV harvesting. From August 2005 to July 2007, a total of 100 donor right hepatectomies were performed with (n = 49) or without (n = 51) the inclusion of the MHV. The decision to take MHV was based on an algorithm that considers various donor and recipient factors. There was no donor mortality in donors in either group. Overall complication rate was higher in MHV (+) donor group, however when remnant liver volume was kept above 30%, complication rates were similar between the groups. The results of this study show that right hepatectomy including the MHV neither affects morbidity nor impairs early liver function in donors when remnant volume is kept above 30%. The decision, therefore, of the extent of right lobe donor hepatectomy should be tailored to the particular conditions considering the graft quality and metabolic demand of the recipient.