This article examines a cross-section of literature and other resources to reveal common reproducibility issues faced by stakeholders regardless of subject area or focus. We identify a variety of issues named as reproducibility barriers, the solutions to such barriers, and reflect on how researchers and information professionals can act to address the ‘reproducibility crisis.’ The finished products of this work include an annotated list of 122 published resources and a primer that identifies and defines key concepts from the resources that contribute to the crisis.
Non-compliance with requirements by staff and funding recipients will result in penalties; policies will evolve over time. Authors of peer-reviewed scholarly publications are required to submit to the NIST public access archive system metadata and their copies of final peer-reviewed journal manuscripts within the scope of this plan once the manuscript is accepted for publication. In lieu of the author's version of the final peer-reviewed manuscript, NIST will also accept the final published article, as formatted by the journal, provided the author has the right to submit the published version. NIST's plan further requires that the final manuscript, which has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, be freely available to the public no later than 12 months following publication. 5. AUTHORITY NIST's authority to require broad public access to the results of federally funded research stems from multiple sources, including, but not necessarily limited to, those below.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.