We present a trust-region optimization of the Edmiston–Ruedenberg orbital localization function. The approach is used to localize both the occupied and the virtual orbitals and is the first demonstration of general virtual orbital localization using the Edmiston–Ruedenberg localization function. In the Edmiston–Ruedenberg approach, the sum of the orbital self-repulsion energies is maximized to obtain the localized orbitals. The Cholesky decomposition reduces the cost of transforming the electron repulsion integrals, and the overall scaling of our implementation is . The optimization is performed with all quantities in the molecular orbital basis, and the localization of the occupied orbitals is often less expensive than the corresponding self-consistent field (SCF) optimization. Furthermore, the occupied orbital localization scales linearly with the basis set. For the virtual space, the cost is significantly higher than the SCF optimization. The orbital spreads of the resulting virtual Edmiston–Ruedenberg orbitals are larger than for other, less expensive, orbital localization functions. This indicates that other localization procedures are more suitable for applications such as local post-Hartree–Fock calculations.

In this work we present the particle-breaking Hartree–Fock (PBHF) model which is a mean-field approach to open molecular systems. The interaction of a system with the environment is parametrized through a particle-breaking term in the molecular Hamiltonian. The PBHF wave function is constructed through an exponential unitary transformation of a Slater determinant with a given number of electrons. We consider only the closed-shell formalism. The parametrization results in a linear combination of Slater determinants with different numbers of electrons, i.e., the PBHF wave function is not an eigenfunction of the number operator. As a result, the density matrix may have fractional occupations which are, because of the unitary parametrization, always between 0.0 and 2.0. The occupations are optimized simultaneously with the orbitals, using the trust-region optimization procedure. In the limit of a particle-conserving Hamiltonian, the PBHF optimization will converge to a standard Hartree–Fock wave function. We show that the average number of electrons may be decreased or increased depending on whether the particle-breaking term affects occupied or virtual orbitals.

In this article we use MP2 and CCSD(T) calculations for the A24 and S66 data sets to explore how midbond functions can be used to generate cost effective counterpoise corrected supramolecular interaction energies of noncovalent complexes. We use the A24 data set to show that the primary role of midbond functions is not to approach the complete basis set limit, but rather to ensure a balanced description of the molecules and the interaction region (unrelated to the basis set superposition error). The need for balance is a consequence of using atom centered basis sets. In the complete basis set limit, the error will disappear, but reaching the complete basis set limit is not feasible beyond small systems. For S66 we investigate the need for increasing the number of midbond centers. Results show that adding a second midbond center increases the accuracy, but the effect is secondary to changing the atom centered basis set. Further, by comparing calculations using the 3s3p2d1f1g midbond set with using aug‐cc‐pVDZ and aug‐cc‐pVTZ as midbond sets, we see that the requirements for the midbond set to be effective, is not just that it contains diffuse functions, but also that high angular momentum functions are included. By comparing two approaches for placing midbond centers we show that results are not particularly sensitive to placement as long as the placement is reasonable.