The established iron requirement for laboratory rodents is 35‐50 ppm, but standard rodent chows contain up to 350 ppm iron. Excess dietary iron exacerbates iron accumulation in hepcidin (Hamp) knockout (KO) mice and rats, which model the iron‐overload disorder hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) in humans. Establishing iron requirements is important to allow for proper experimental design when studying Hamp KOs since WT littermates are not iron‐loaded (and thus not an appropriate control group for iron‐loaded Hamp KOs). We hypothesized that Hamp KOs have iron requirements at least 50% below those of WT animals, given that intestinal iron absorption is inappropriately elevated (by 2‐3‐fold) in the KOs. In the present study, WT and Hamp KO mice and rats of both sexes were weaned onto one of four AIN‐93G purified rodent diets, with the following iron concentrations (in ppm): 5‐7 (low), 17‐20 (low marginal), 24‐27 (high marginal), or 45‐49 (adequate). After 6 weeks on the diets, bioindicators of iron status were assessed, including blood hemoglobin content and hematocrit, serum ferritin and nonheme iron content, tissue nonheme iron concentration, and blood transferrin saturation. Outcomes showed that significant iron loading occurred in Hamp KO animals when fed the high‐marginal and adequate iron diets, as indicated by higher serum ferritin and nonheme iron content, elevated hepatic iron levels and increased TSAT. Iron loading, however, did not occur when the KO rats and mice were fed the low‐marginal iron diets. Animals fed the low‐iron diet, however, developed IDA. We thus conclude that the optimal amount of dietary iron that will not result in iron loading post‐weaning in Hamp KOs, while also not causing iron depletion, is ~22 ppm. Consistent with our hypothesis then, Hamp KO rodents require about half as much iron as WT controls.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.