Acute peripheral occlusive arterial disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among older persons. Catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy is the treatment of choice but has limitations: long lytic times, occlusions refractory to thrombolysis, and a high rate of restenosis. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the use of the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab versus aspirin in conjunction with thrombolysis in patients with acute peripheral occlusive arterial disease associated with arterial thrombosis. A total of 84 patients were randomized into two equal groups to receive 5 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator intravenously and 500 IU heparin/hour along with either 500 mg acetylsalicylic acid or a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg abciximab followed by 10 microg/min abciximab over 12 hours (heparin reduced to 250 IU/hour). Primary efficacy criteria included the number of rehospitalizations, reinterventions, and amputations during the following 6 months. Secondary endpoints were the changes in the Fontaine stage, Bollinger index (vessel occlusion), ankle-to-brachial ratios, distance to claudication after 6 months, and the duration of the initial local lysis treatment. Adjunctive use of abciximab reduced the rates of rehospitalization, reinterventions, and amputations versus results with the use of aspirin (10 vs 14 occurrences, respectively; 9 vs 11; 3 vs 5; when summed, intergroup difference p < 0.05). Secondary peripheral occlusive arterial disease variables became highly significant versus aspirin (p < 0.001 or greater) at 3 and 6 months after treatment. The duration of lysis was markedly shorter upon addition of abciximab versus aspirin (75 vs 110 min; p < 0.001). No major bleeding complications or embolisms occurred. These preliminary results indicate that abciximab may have a useful role when used adjunctively with a thrombolytic agent in older persons with acute peripheral occlusive arterial disease and arterial thrombosis.

Acute peripheral arterial occlusive disease is an important factor affecting the mobility and mortality rate of elderly patients. Catheter-guided arterial thrombolysis in these patients has its limitations: long lysis times, early occlusions, and high restenosis rates. The study investigated whether the use of tirofiban has the same favorable effect as the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab and whether lysis times can be shortened and the disease course positively influenced by these substances. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Each group received 5 mg recombinant tissue-type (rt-PA) plasminogen activator by slow intra-arterial injection for 10 minutes followed by 5 mg rt-PA per hour and 500 IU heparin per hour IV. After randomization 1 group received a bolus of 0.25 mg abciximab per kg body weight followed by 10 mg per minute IV for 12 hours (heparin was reduced to 250 IU/hr). The other group received a bolus of 0.4 microg tirofiban per kg body weight as well as postinterventional medication with 0.1 microg tirofiban per minute and kg body weight for 24 hours. During medication with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, the patients received a reduced heparin dosage for 24 hours. After 24 hours both groups received 200 mg aspirin orally and full heparinization controlled on the basis of the partial thromboplastin time. The following efficacy criteria were analyzed: rehospitalization events, reintervention events, and amputations within 6 months. Secondary endpoints were changes in the Fontaine stage, the crurobrachial index, the distance to claudication, and the duration of local arterial lysis. No significant differences were found between the abciximab and tirofiban groups in terms of the rehospitalization, reintervention, or amputation rates, nor were there any group differences in the total number of events. The secondary parameters, such as the crurobrachial index, distance to claudication, and Fontaine stage, also showed no significant differences between the 2 groups within 6 months. The duration of lysis was significantly shorter in the abciximab group. Major bleeding events did not occur in either group. With regard to the adverse effect rate, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Both abciximab and tirofiban can be used successfully in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and arterial thrombosis.