The branching ratios and supercollider cross sections of the two CP-even Higgs scalars h 0 and HO of the minimal supersymmetric model (MSSM) are computed (including the effects of leading log radiative corrections). The "gold-plated" Higgs-boson decay into ZZ-1-1-1' 1 -is analyzed at the CERN Large Hadron Collider and Superconducting Super Collider, and the regions of MSSM Higgs sector parameter space where the h 0 or H O can be detected in this mode are delineated. The prospects for Higgsboson detection as a function of the detector resolution are discussed. The viability of other decay modes for detecting the h 0 and H n is briefly considered.PACS number(s1: 13.85.Qk, 12.15.Cc, 14.80.Gt

No abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Yale Law Journal.

STHOUGH THE LAW OF VERTICAL INTEGRATION' has been developing ,yunder the Sherman Act for better than forty years, opinions as to what that law is, and what it has been, are still confused. In part, this confusion reflects the state of the law; in part, it springs from a misreading of the cases. This paper represents an attempt to reorder this area of the antitrust law; it is an attempt to discern a consistent doctrine concerning vertical integration running through the cases, and to evaluate the worth of that doctrine in terms of the purposes of the Sherman Act. The current predominant view of the case law appears to be that prior to 1940 vertical integration had not been attacked as such, and that the Sherman Act does not, and did not, condemn such integration except when it is used to extend monopoly from one level of production to another. 2 This paper reaches completely contrary conclusions. First, the recent attacks upon vertical integration are not something new in the law. Rather they are merely a spectacular bringing to fruition of a way of thinking, an attitude, that goes back to the earliest cases. Second, the Sherman Act, "new" or "old," has not condemned vertical integration only where there was monopoly at one level of operation (horizontal monopoly). Where the courts have thought abusive practices traceable to

No abstract