No abstract

The operative results and complications after stoma closure in 548 patients operated on between 1972 and 1993 are described in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into three groups (group I,n = 74, 1972-1976; group II,n = 256, 1977-1985; group III,n = 218, 1986-1993) according to the year of operation and changing concepts in colorectal surgery. The overall mortality rate was 2.0%. The morbidity rate including minor complications was significantly reduced from 70.3% in group I to 27.1% in group III. Postoperative wound infections and fever were the most common complications. The location of the stoma and the operative technique did not markedly influence the morbidity rate. The most striking decrease in complications was achieved by the combined usage of orthograde lavage and perioperative antibiotic treatment (14.6% wound infections, 6.9% postoperative fever). In conclusion, a standardized perioperative treatment protocol including orthograde lavage and antibiotics is recommended.

Diverticular disease is an increasingly common clinical problem especially in Western industrialized countries, but the mechanism by which the disease develops remains unclear. Based on studies showing a structural change in the colonic wall in these patients, we examined whether there are any disorders concerning the collagen metabolism in patients with diverticular disease. Samples of colonic tissue from 13 patients with diverticulitis were compared to 14 controls. We performed a Sirius red test for the overall collagen content and immunohistochemical studies facing differentiation between collagen type I and type III and the expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 13. In the bowel sections of patients with diverticulitis there were decreased levels of mature collagen type I (1.37+/- 0.32 vs. 1.59 +/- 0.31) and increased levels of collagen type III (1.61+/- 0.32 vs. 1.42 +/- 0.42), with a resulting lower collagen ratio I/III. The expression of MMP-I was reduced significantly in the diverticulitis group (4.83 +/- 0.92 vs. 6.02 +/- 1.98) while expression of MMP-13 did not differ significantly between the two groups (1.03 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.04 +/- 0.12). Our findings support the theory of structural changes in the colonic wall as one of the major pathogenic factors in the development of diverticular disease. Further studies must focus on the complex interactions of several extracellular matrix components.

The tendency towards sphincter-preserving resection for distal rectal cancers has led to the technique of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis (CPA) after low anterior resection. The aim of the present study was to compare complication rate, anorectal physiology and functional results after both types of reconstruction after ultra-low intersphincteric resection. A total of 31 patients who had undergone CPA were followed up prospectively using anorectal manometry and a standardised questionnaire and were compared with 63 patients who had undergone CAA and were followed up in the same way. The complication rate after CPA did not differ significantly from that after CAA. One year postoperatively, the median stool frequency and urgency were reduced after CPA (1.7+/-2.2/day; 7% vs. 2.4+/-3.6/day; 14%; P<0.05). Three months after colostomy/ileostomy closure, the maximum tolerable volume, threshold volume and compliance were decreased after CAA when compared with CPA (55+/-12, 34+/-12, and 3.9+/-0.3 ml/mmHg vs. 85+/-21, 53+/-11 and 6.2 ml/mmHg, respectively; P<0.05). Anal manometry revealed no significant differences in the anal resting and squeeze pressure. One year postoperatively, continence also did not differ significantly between CPA and CAA. Colonic J-pouch reconstruction seems to be superior to the straight coloanal anastomosis, especially during the first postoperative year. In view of the often poor prognosis of the patients, it is the reconstruction of choice after ultra-low resections of the rectum.

The influence of mesh material on the clinical outcome of hernia repair has often been neglected, although recent studies have clearly demonstrated the importance of mesh properties for integration in the abdominal wall. Of particular significance are the amount of mesh material and the pore size. In the following study, patients received different mesh types with distinct amounts of polypropylene and of various pore sizes for incisional hernia repair. We investigated whether the type of material influenced the clinical and functional outcomes. Between 1991 and 1999, 235 patients received polypropylene meshes in a sublay position for incisional hernia repair: 115 patients were implanted with a Marlex heavy-weight mesh (Mhw mesh), 37 patients with an Atrium heavy-weight mesh (Ahw mesh) and 83 with a Vypro low-weight mesh (Vlw mesh). The study protocol included ultrasound examination and 3D-stereography in all patients, with a total follow-up of 24 +/- 13 months (Mhw-mesh), 11 +/- 8 months (Ahw-mesh) and 8 +/- 7 months (Vlw-mesh). Our findings demonstrate that the side effects of mesh implantation, comprising paraesthesia and restriction of abdominal wall mobility, were significantly affected by the type of material implanted. Three-dimensional stereographic examinations were well in accordance with our clinical findings. Our data support the hypothesis that the use of low-weight large-pore meshes is advantageous for abdominal wall function.