Nonagenarians differ from patients aged 70-79 and 80-89 years in baseline characteristics, complication and mortality rates. Differences increased gradually with age. The results of this study can be used, in combination with the Almelo Hip Fracture Score, to deliver efficiently targeted orthogeriatric treatment to the right patient group. Purpose In previous literature, elderly with a hip fracture are frequently defined as ≥ 70 years. However, given the ageing population and the rapidly increasing number of 'nonagenarians' (aged ≥ 90 years), the question rises whether this definition is still actual. The aim of this study is to determine whether nonagenarians show differences compared to patients aged 70-79 years and patients aged 80-89 years in terms of patient characteristics, complications and mortality rate. Methods From April 2008 until December 2016, hip fracture patients aged ≥ 70 years treated according to our orthogeriatric treatment model were included. Patients were divided into three different groups based on age at admission: 70-79 years, 80-89 years and ≥ 90 years. Patient characteristics, risk of early mortality, complications and outcomes were analysed. Risk factors for 30-day mortality in nonagenarians were determined. Results A total of 1587 patients were included: 465 patients aged 70-80 years, 867 patients aged 80-90 years and 255 patients aged ≥ 90 years. Nonagenarians were more often female and had a lower haemoglobin level at admission. Prefracture, they were more often living in a nursing home, were more dependent in activities of daily living and mobility and had a higher risk of early mortality calculated with the Almelo Hip Fracture Score (AHFS). Post-operative, nonagenarians suffer significantly more often from delirium and anaemia. The 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality were significantly higher. Differences increased gradually with age. Conclusion Nonagenarians differ from patients aged 70-79 and 80-89 years in baseline characteristics, complication and mortality rates. Differences increased gradually with age. The results of this study can be used, in combination with the Almelo Hip Fracture Score, to deliver efficiently targeted orthogeriatric treatment to the right patient group.

Objectives To develop a transmural pathway for healthcare professionals across institutions to monitor the recovery of hip fracture patients. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the pathway's feasibility and initial outcomes. Design Prospective cohort study. Method Stakeholders of the hospital and geriatric rehabilitation institutions implemented a transmural monitoring pathway in which different geriatric health domains were monitored during three phases: The in-hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, and outpatient follow-up phase. The outcomes for the first 291 patients and the feasibility of the pathway were evaluated. If the outcomes of the clinimetrics significantly improved over time, progress in functional recovery was assumed. Feasibility was assessed according to the rate of adherence to the clinimetric tests. Results During the in-hospital phase, patients showed a decline in functional level (the Katz index of independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL) pre-fracture vs. discharge: 0 (0–2) vs. 4 (4–5), P < 0.001). Patients, in which 78.6% (n = 140) had cognitive impairment and 41.2% had malnutrition, showed the most progress (Katz-ADL 2 (1–3)) during the inpatient rehabilitation phase. In the outpatient follow-up phase, recovery remained ongoing, but most patients had not returned to their pre-fracture functional levels (Katz-ADL 1 (1–3)). The pathway feasibility during the first phase was excellent (>85%), whereas room for improvement existed during other phases (<85%). Conclusion The transmural monitoring pathway provides insight into the entire recovery process for all involved healthcare professionals. Patients showed the most progress during the rehabilitation phase. The pathway feasibility was excellent during the in-hospital phase, but improvements could be made during other phases.

Colonoscopy is a common and increasingly performed procedure. It is used both as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality. Splenic injury after colonoscopy is a rare, yet life-threatening complication, most often caused by traction on the splenocolic ligament or excessive manipulation during the procedure. Although non-operative treatment is preferred upon splenic injury, early surgical or radiological intervention may be necessary in specific cases, for example in case of haemodynamic instability. A 71-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our emergency room due to shock after colonoscopy 2 days earlier. A computed tomography scan showed splenic rupture with active intra-abdominal, venous blood loss, and microperforation of the colon. An immediate splenectomy and colon repair were performed through laparotomy. After 6 days, the patient was discharged from hospital in good health. Although splenic rupture is a rare complication of colonoscopy, patients with abdominal pain and/or shock should be checked for complications such as splenic injury and colon perforation.

A 24-year-old male with an idiopathic renal Fanconi syndrome presented to our ER after a low-energetic fall. Conventional imaging revealed a right subtrochanteric femoral fracture, severely decreased bone quality and cannulated collum femoris screws on the contralateral side. Regular plate-screw osteosynthesis or cephalomedullary implantation was deemed insufficient, due to a high iatrogenic and periprosthetic fracture probability. The decision was made to perform a plate-screw osteosynthesis combined with an intramedullary polymer bone enhancement (IlluminOss), to minimize this risk. No complications occurred perioperatively. The patient was able to walk independently two months postoperatively. This case shows that use of polymer implant as an enhancement of osteosynthesis in repair of fractures in the Fanconi syndrome is a safe and possible useful treatment method.

Over the last decade Surgical Stabilisation of Rib Fractures (SSFR) gained popularity in our hospital. With increased numbers, we noted that frequently injuries were missed during primary/secondary survey and radiological imaging, that were found during the surgical procedure. With this observation, the research question was formulated: What is the value of diagnostics thoracotomy or thoracoscopy during surgical stabilisation of rib fractures? MethodsIn a single centre, retrospective study between February 2010 till December 2019, trauma patients who underwent Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSFR) and an inspection thoracotomy were included.