Background HPV screening/vaccination has been observed lower for ethic minorities. Understanding factors that predict and can improve attendance is therefore key. Hence, the aim was to identify causes, especially concerning the quality of the patient-provider relationship, that predict past HPV screening and vaccination turnout of Roma women in Hungary. Methods Cross-sectional research design with self-developed, culturally sensitive questionnaire. A final, female Roma sample of 368 participants was randomly selected from census register. Community nurses contacted participants and distributed surveys. Surveys were mailed-in by participants. Bivariate logistic regression was used to predict former participation in HPV screening/vaccination. Results Of the total sample, 17.4% of women attended at least one cervical screening and HPV vaccination in the past. Bad screening experience was positively associated with racially unfair behaviors of physicians. The odds of past attendance were 4.5 times greater if ‘no negative earlier experience’ occurred, 3.3 times likelier if community nurse performed screening/immunization and 1.6 times more probable if respondent felt ‘no shame’. Evaluating the screening/vaccination process painful, being only financially motivated and attendance involving a lot of travel decreased the odds of ‘no show’ by 50%, 40% and 41%, respectively. Conclusions When considering the ratio of past cervical screening attendance, we conclude that our female Roma sample did not behave differently from the general population. We saw no evidence that racial mistreatment made any contribution to explaining cervical screening participation. Past positive screening experience and the quality of patient-provider relationship increased the odds of participation the most. Cancer of friends, pain, financial motivation and travel distance decreased odds of participation to a lesser extent. In order to improve future screening and immunization, community nurses should play more central and advanced role in the organization and implementation of such services specifically targeting Roma populations.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A méhnyakdaganatok kérdése kiemelten fontos, megoldatlan népegészségügyi probléma. A betegség terhe magas, ami elsősorban az alacsony és közepes jövedelmű országokban élőknél jelentkezik. Célkitűzés: Elemzésünk célja volt meghatározni a méhnyakdaganatok epidemiológiai és egészségbiztosítási betegségterhét Magyarországon a 2018-as évre vonatkoztatva. Adatok és módszerek: Elemzésünket a Nemzeti Egészségbiztosítási Alapkezelő (NEAK) finanszírozási adatbázisának 2018. évi adatai alapján végeztük az in situ (D06), a jóindulatú (D26.0) és a malignus (C53) méhnyakdaganatokra vonatkozóan. Az elemzés a NEAK által finanszírozott összes szolgáltatóra és ellátási formára kiterjed. Meghatároztuk az éves betegszámokat, a prevalenciát 100 000 lakosra, továbbá az éves egészségbiztosítási kiadásokat betegségcsoportonként és korcsoportos bontásban, valamennyi egészségbiztosítási ellátás tekintetében. Eredmények: A NEAK 2018-ban 1,276 milliárd Ft-ot (4,7 millió USD; 4,0 millió EUR) költött a méhnyakdaganatok kezelésére. A betegek és a finanszírozás döntő többsége a méhnyak rosszindulatú daganatához kapcsolható. A finanszírozásból a malignus méhnyakdaganatok részesedése 97%. Ellátási típusonként vizsgálva a legnagyobb kiadási tétel az aktívfekvőbeteg-szakellátásban jelenik meg, éves szinten 763,9 millió Ft, ami az összköltség 59,9%-a. A 100 000 lakosra jutó prevalencia az aktívfekvőbeteg-szakellátás igénybevételi adatai alapján 26/100 000 lakos. Következtetés: A méhnyakdaganatok kezelésének meghatározó költségeleme az aktívfekvőbeteg-szakellátás. Hazánkban a szervezett méhnyakszűrés korszerűsítéseként az új szűrési stratégiát megfelelő finanszírozási támogatással célszerű bevezetni, a szűrővizsgálatoknak, a hozzájuk kapcsolódó további diagnosztikus kivizsgálásnak és terápiának a teljesítményvolumen-korlát alóli mentesítésével. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(Suppl 1): 22–29. Summary. Introduction: Cervical cancer is a particularly important, unresolved public health problem. The burden of the disease is high, primarily in those living in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: Our aim was to determine the annual epidemiological disease burden and health insurance cost of cervical cancer in Hungary in 2018. Data and methods: Our analysis was made according to the financial database of the National Health Insurance Fund Administration (NHIFA) of Hungary for the year 2018, which covers all service providers and maintenance forms financed by NHIFA. We analysed the in situ (D06), the benignant (D26.0) and the malignant (C53) cervical tumours. The data analysed included annual patient numbers and prevalence of care utilisation per 100 000 population furthermore annual health insurance costs calculated for disease and age groups. Results: In 2018, NHIFA spent 1.276 billion HUF (4.7 million USD, 4.0 million EUR) on the treatment of patients with cervical cancer. The majority of patients and funding can be linked to malignant cervical cancer (97%). Acute inpatient care was the major cost driver: 763.9 million HUF (59.9% of the total health insurance expenditures) annually. The prevalence is 26 per 100 000 population based on acute inpatient care data. Conclusion: Acute inpatient care was the major cost driver. In Hungary, as a modernization of organized cervical screening, it is appropriate to introduce a new screening strategy with appropriate financial support, by exempting screening tests, associated additional diagnostic testing, and therapy from the performance volume limit. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(Suppl 1): 22–29.

Background: HPV screening/vaccination has been observed lower for ethic minorities. Understanding factors that predict and can improve attendance is therefore key. Hence, the aim was to identify causes, especially concerning the quality of the patient-provider relationship, that predict past HPV screening and vaccination turnout of Roma women in Hungary.Methods: Cross-sectional research design with self-developed, culturally sensitive questionnaire. A female Roma sample of 500 potential participants was randomly selected from census register. Community nurses contacted participants and distributed surveys. Surveys were mailed-in by participants. Bivariate logistic regression was used to predict former participation in HPV screening/vaccination.Results: Of the total sample, 17.4% of women attended at least one cervical screening and HPV vaccination in the past. Past negative screening experience was negatively correlated to community nurses and positively to physicians. The odds of past attendance were 4.5 times greater if ‘no negative earlier experience’ occurred, 3.3 times likelier if community nurse performed screening/immunization and 1.6 times more probable if respondent felt ‘no shame’. Evaluating the screening/vaccination process painful, being only financially motivated and attendance involving a lot of travel decreased the odds of ‘no show’ by 50%, 40% and 41%, respectively.Conclusions: When considering the ratio of past cervical screening attendance, we conclude that our female Roma sample did not behave differently from the general population. We saw no evidence that racial mistreatment made any contribution to explaining cervical screening participation. Past positive screening experience and the quality of patient-provider relationship increased the odds of participation the most. Cancer of friends, pain, financial motivation and travel distance decreased odds of participation to a lesser extent. In order to improve future screening and immunization, community nurses should play more central and advanced role in the organization and implementation of such services specifically targeting Roma populations.

Objectives: Imposing taxes on unhealthy goods can generate income, raise people's health awareness, and eventually decrease the prevalence of chronic diseases. Our aim was to assess the impact of Hungary's public health product tax (PHPT) since its implementation in September 2011. Differences in purchasing habits between households with different income statuses were also compared.Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of tax bases and income was carried out, and an interrupted time series analysis using the generalised least squares method was performed to examine the changes in trends regarding the purchase of taxable products before and after the implementation of the tax. The amount of tax base (in kilograms or litres), income (in HUF and EUR), and annual purchased quantity of food and beverage groups per household were assessed. Data were derived from the National Tax and Customs Administration of Hungary and the Hungarian Household Budget and Living Conditions Surveys. The study sample was composed of households who participated in the surveys (mean = 8,359, SD = 1,146) between 2006 and 2018.Results: The households' tax bases and incomes increased constantly (with a few exceptions). The total revenue was 19.49 billion HUF (67.37 million EUR) in 2012 and 59.19 billion HUF (168.55 million EUR) in 2020. However, the households' purchasing habits did not change as expected. A significant short-term decrease (between 2012 and 2013) in purchasing unhealthy goods was observed for three groups: soft drinks (p = 0.009), jams (p = 0.047), and fruit juices (p = 0.038). Only soft drinks showed a significant decreasing trend in the post-intervention period between 2012 and 2018 (p < 0.001).Conclusions: We concluded that the PHPT did not decrease households' unhealthy food purchasing trend, although it has a positive effect as it can create revenue for health care and health-promoting programmes.

No abstract