Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a salvage procedure. We report a series of 20 patients who underwent TTCA using an intramedullary nail. Of the 20 patients, 7 (35%) had diabetes mellitus. The patient experiences and outcomes were analyzed. Their mean age was 61.1 (range 39 to 78) years. The minimum follow-up period was 13 (mean 28, range 13 to 49) months. Surgical indications included diabetic Charcot arthropathy in 7 (35%), hindfoot osteoarthritis in 10 (50%), and severe equinovarus deformity in 3 (15%). A calcaneal spiral blade was used in 2 patients (10%). Significant improvements (p < .05) were observed in 5 of 8 Short-Form 36-item Health Survey components, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scale (p < .001), and visual analog scale for pain (p < .001). The mean length of the hospital stay was 6.7 (range 1 to 27) days. Of the 20 patients, 76.9% had improvement in their activity postoperatively. Also, 81.8% were able to resume their preoperative work after a mean of 7.89 (range 3 to 24) months. Overall, 19 patients (95%) reported favorable outcomes. Superficial wound infection (n = 4; 20%) and deep wound infection (n = 3; 15%) were the most common complications (35%), with 1 case (5%) culminating in a below-the-knee amputation. Radiographic union was achieved in 16 of the tibiotalar joints (80%), 16 subtalar joints (80%), and 4 tibiocalcaneal fusions (20%). In a subgroup analysis of 7 patients with diabetes mellitus (35%), the incidence of wound complications and fusion was comparable to that of the primary cohort. TTCA performed with an intramedullary nail appears to offer a reliable and safe alternative for patients with severe ankle and hindfoot pathologic entities, including those with diabetes mellitus.

No abstract

Purpose Timing of surgery for orthopaedic injuries continues to evolve, as an improved understanding of biology, healing, and technological advances continues to challenge historical norms. With the growing COVID-19 pandemic stretching limited healthcare resources, postponing surgery becomes an inevitable and unenviable task for most orthopaedic surgeons, and a shift in outpatient paradigms is required to mitigate poor outcomes in patients. Methods A scoping review of five databases on surgical timing and orthopaedic soft-tissue injuries was performed. All randomized controlled trials, longitudinal cohort studies, retrospective case series, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions were included for review, with 65 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Results Better outcomes appear to be associated with early surgery for subluxations (< 1 week), recurrent dislocations (> 2 episodes), ligamentous and tendinous injuries (< 2 weeks), and bony avulsion injuries (< 3 weeks). Spinal conditions with neurological compromise should be operated on within 24 hours and spinal instability within 72 hours to reduce the risk of complications and poor outcomes. Conclusion Most soft-tissue orthopaedic injuries can be managed with outpatient ambulatory surgery in a semi-elective setting. As the paradigm for outpatient surgery shifts due to technological advances and the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical for surgeons to time their surgery appropriately to maintain the high standards of orthopaedic practice.

Introduction The reintroduction of elective Orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to occur in phases, dictated by resource limitations and loco-regional pandemic status. Guidelines providing a general framework for the prioritisation of surgery have largely been based on surgical urgency, while scoring systems such as the MeNTS score may have limited applicability in the setting of Orthopaedic Surgery. We, therefore, propose an Orthopaedic-specific algorithm (‘MeNT-OS’), based on a modification of the MeNTS scoring system, that may be used to objectively triage and prioritise Orthopaedic cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We developed a scoring algorithm modified from the Medically Necessary Time-Sensitive Procedure (MeNTS) score with 13 unique variables, reflecting human and physical resource utilisation, surgical complexity, functional status of patients, as well as COVID-19 transmission risk. This score was then trialled in a sample of 118 cases, comprising 69 completed and 49 postponed cases. A higher overall score was intended to correlate with lower surgical prioritisation. Results The use of our scoring system resulted in higher average scores for postponed cases compared to completed cases, as well as higher median, 25th and 75th percentile scores. These results were statistically significant and showed concordance with the ad hoc decisions made before the scoring system was used, with the lower scores for completed cases suggesting a more favourable risk–benefit ratio for being performed as compared to the postponed cases. Conclusion The utility of the proposed ‘MeNT-OS’ scoring system has been assessed using data from our institution and offers an objective and systematic approach that is geared towards Orthopaedic procedures. We believe this scoring tool can provide Orthopaedic surgeons a safe and equitable approach to making difficult decisions on prioritisation of surgery during the COVID-19 period, and possibly other resource-limited settings in the future.

Background and purpose — The ongoing Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken a toll on healthcare systems around the world. This has led to guidelines advising against elective procedures, which includes elective arthroplasty. Despite arthroplasty being an elective procedure, some arthroplasties are arguably essential, as pain or functional impairment maybe devastating for patients, especially during this difficult period. We describe our experience as the Division of Arthroplasty in the hospital at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Patients and methods — The number of COVID-19 cases reported both nationwide and at our institution from February 2020 to date were reviewed. We then collated the number of arthroplasties that we were able to cope with on a weekly basis and charted it against the number of new COVID-19 cases admitted to our institution and the prevalence of COVID-19 within the Singapore population. Results — During the COVID-19 pandemic period, a significant decrease in the volume of arthroplasties was seen. 47 arthroplasties were performed during the pandemic period from February to April, with a weekly average of 5 cases. This was a 74% reduction compared with our institutional baseline. The least number of surgeries were performed during early periods of the pandemic. This eventually rose to a maximum of 47% of our baseline numbers. Throughout this period, no cases of COVID-19 infection were reported amongst the orthopedic inpatients at our institution. Interpretation — During the early periods of the pandemic, careful planning was required to evaluate the pandemic situation and gauge our resources and manpower. Our study illustrates the number of arthroplasties that can potentially be done relative to the disease curve. This could serve as a guide to reinstating arthroplasty as the pandemic dies down. However, it is prudent to note that these situations are widely dynamic and frequent re-evaluation is required to secure patient and healthcare personnel safety, while ensuring appropriate care is delivered.