Testicular torsion is an urological emergency requiring early diagnosis and immediate surgical intervention for successful salvage. Decision for testicular salvage is made during surgery by assessing the color of the testis. We present a case where Indocyanine green fluorescence was used to assess testicular perfusion during surgery as an additional evaluation tool for testicular viability.

Patient: Female, 84-year-old Final Diagnosis: Diaphragmatic hernia • small bowel obstruction Symptoms: Abdominal pain Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Laparoscopic surgery Specialty: Surgery Objective: Rare disease Background: Pericardio-peritoneal windows are surgically created to treat symptomatic pericardial effusion, usually of oncological origin, to alleviate cardiac tamponade-like symptoms. Common complications include infection, failure to drain the fluid correctly, and arrythmias. There are few published cases of intra-abdominal complications due to these interventions. This report discusses pericardial diaphragmatic incarcerated hernia, which is one such complication. Case Report: We report the case of an 84-year-old woman with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma, who recently underwent surgery to create a pericardio-peritoneal window to treat a chronic malignant pericardial effusion. The patient presented in our Emergency Department because of abdominal pain with absence of flatus and stool for more than 4 days. Computed tomography scanning confirmed a proximal small-bowel obstruction due to incarcerated small bowel into the pericardial window. Reduction of the hernia was performed laparoscopically. After a bowel viability assessment by indocyanine green angiography, the pericardial window was covered by a noncovered macroporous mesh to avoid recurrence and to allow continuous pericardial fluid drainage. Conclusions: In case of abdominal pain after the creation of a pericardio-peritoneal window, we suggest the prompt use of computed tomography after initial examination. Indeed, although rare, a pericardial diaphragmatic hernia is possible and requires surgical exploration if there is a risk of bowel strangulation. The operation can be done laparoscopically, and the hernia repair should involve the placement of a nonabsorbable and noncovered macroporous mesh. This should prevent hernia recurrence, while also allowing adequate drainage of the pericar-dial effusion.

Internal hernias after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are one of the most common complications in bariatric surgery leading to hospital readmissions with or without surgery. Due to the insidious and non-specific clinical presentation combined with difficult radiological identification, internal hernias remain a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Delay in diagnosis and treatment can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We report the case of a patient presenting an unusual intestinal obstruction due to two simultaneous and distinct internals hernias affecting the Petersen’s defect and the foramen of Winslow 4 years after a laparoscopic gastric bypass. A 41-year-old female patient with a history of robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presented with proximal small bowel obstruction symptoms and epigastric pain. Computed tomography showed two simultaneous internal hernias, one affecting the Petersen’s defect and the other affecting the foramen of Winslow with an incarcerated transverse colon. We performed an explorative laparoscopy to reduce both hernias and, after an assessment of bowel viability by indocyanine green angiography, we closed both defects with interrupted non-absorbable sutures to prevent recurrence. The follow-up of more than 1 year has been uneventful. In the cases of obstruction and hospital admission after gastric bypass, we suggest that patients undergo a computed tomography directly after the initial examination. Internal hernia diagnosis is often delicate and requires surgical exploration since bowel strangulation can lead to dramatic outcomes. The operation can be safely done laparoscopically, and all internal hernia defects should be repaired with non-absorbable sutures.

No abstract

BackgroundThe literature seems to indicate that the number of appendectomies dropped at the beginning of the coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19 pandemic), while the number of complicated appendicitis increased due to late presentation. In addition, a longer delay before surgical treatment resulted in a higher morbidity. This study aims to compare the number of appendectomies, the severity, and the management of acute appendicitis during the first two pandemic peaks of COVID-19 with those observed during the same seasonal periods in the previous 2 years in a regional hospital in Switzerland.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed and compared the number of appendectomies, rate of complicated appendicitis, delay to consultation and to surgery, distribution of appendectomies over a 24-h schedule, postoperative outcomes, and rates of overall complications in 177 patients, that is, 66 during the COVID-19 pandemic and 111 before the pandemic.ResultsNo statistical difference was found in the number of appendectomies, duration of symptoms before consultation, median time to surgery, number of appendectomies performed outside the usual scheduled time for non-urgent surgery, length of postoperative stay, or the rates of overall complications. However, there was a trend in the rate of complicated appendicitis (p = .05).ConclusionIn spite of a high incidence rate of COVID-19 in our canton, the impact of COVID-19 on our population did not follow the pattern observed elsewhere. The reasons for this might be that people would still present to the emergency department due to less strict social distancing measures. Great availability of emergency operating room may also account for the unchanged delay preceding surgical treatment and complication rates.