The emergence of metallo--lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates is a challenge to routine microbiology laboratories, since there are no standardized methods for detecting such isolates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different phenotypic methods to detect MBL production among Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., and enterobacterial isolates, including GIM, IMP, SIM, SPM, and VIM variants. A total of 46 genetically unrelated Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Acinetobacter sp., and enterobacterial strains producing distinct MBLs were tested. Nineteen strains were included as negative controls. The inhibition of bacterial growth and -lactam hydrolysis caused by MBL inhibitors (IMBL) also were evaluated. The isolates were tested for MBL production by both a double-disk synergy test (DDST) and a combined disk assay (CD) using imipenem and ceftazidime as substrates in combination with distinct IMBL. One hundred percent sensitivity and specificity were achieved by DDST using 2-mercaptopropionic acid in combination with ceftazidime and imipenem for the detection of MBL production among P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species isolates, respectively. The CD test showed the same results for detecting MBL-producing enterobacteria by combining imipenem and EDTA, with a 5.0-mm-breakpoint increase in the size of the inhibition zone. Our results indicate that both phenotypic methods to detect MBL-producing isolates should be based on the genera to be tested, regardless of the enzyme produced by such isolates, as well as on the local prevalence of MBL producers.Since the early 1990s, new metallo--lactamase (MBL)-encoding genes have been reported all over the world in clinically important pathogens, such as Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (19,27,35,40). The emergence of MBL-encoding genes is worrisome, since they usually are carried by mobile genetic structures with great ability to spread (3,5,18,24,36). Moreover, increased mortality rates have been documented for patients infected with MBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa, especially due to inadequate empirical therapy (39). Therefore, early detection of MBL-producing organisms is crucial to establish appropriate antimicrobial therapy and to prevent their inter-and intrahospital dissemination (10, 35).Several phenotypic methods based on MBL inhibition by EDTA or thiol-based compounds have been published. Although they are simple to perform and cheaper than genotypic methods, they have shown discordant results depending on the employed methodology, -lactam substrates, MBL inhibitors (IMBL), and bacterial genus tested (11,14,17,21,26). In addition, SPM-, GIM-, and SIM-producing pathogens rarely have been evaluated by these studies.The high diversity and prevalence of MBL-producing P.aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and Enterobacteriaceae isolates have motivated the search for an accurate MBL screening test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the double-disk synergy test (DDST) ...