No abstract

A large International Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Study Group has been formed. As its first task, the group has taken upon itself the role of defining the clinical features of the RLS. As minimal criteria for diagnosis, the group proposes the following four features: (a) desire to move the extremities, often associated with paresthesias/dysesthesias; (b) motor restlessness; (c) worsening of symptoms at rest with at least temporary relief by activity, and (d) worsening of symptoms in the evening or night. Other features commonly seen in RLS include sleep disturbance, periodic limb movements in sleep and similar involuntary movements while awake, a normal neurological examination in the idiopathic form, a tendency for the symptoms to be worse in middle to older age, and, in some cases, a family history suggestive of an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance.

Summary: Methylphenidate, pemoline, and protriptyline were studied for their treatment efficacy in narcolepsy. A low, intermediate, and high dose level of each drug was studied for 1 week. For methylphenidate the doses were 10, 30, or 60 mg/day; for pemoline, 18.75,56.25, or 112.5 mg/day; and for protriptyline 10, 30, or 60 mg/day. The order of dose levels was random from subject to subject and the daily dose was divided into thirds and taken in identically appearing capsules morning, noon, and afternoon. Subjects were 6 narcoleptic patients studied on methylphenidate (5 women and 1 man; mean age 54.5 + 11.7 years), 7 narcoleptic patients studied on pemoline (5 women and 2 men; mean age 43.0 + 7.1 years), and 4 narcoleptic patients studied on protriptyline (2 women and 2 men; mean age 42.5 + 16.9 years). Testing consisted of day-long sessions occurring at the end of each dose level and involving a clinical status questionnaire as well as maintenance of wakefulness, Wilkinson addition, and Digit-Symbol Substitution tests. Results were compared with 9 control subjects with no sleep disorder (5 women and 4 men; mean age 39.2 + 8.4 years) who were given placebo that was purported to be a "stimulant drug" and tested in a similar manner. Results demonstrated profound differences in ability to stay awake and perform between narcoleptic patients and controls. Data also suggested that methylphenidate significantly improves ability to stay awake. Pemoline seems to improve ability to perform. Protriptyline does not significantly alter ability to stay awake or to perform.

With the publication of the Multiple Sclerosis Council Guideline on the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue, there has been increased appreciation for the role fatigue can play in MS. Secondary fatigue is fatigue caused by other etiologies than those directly related to MS. Once these causes are ruled out, fatigue is related to MS. Secondary MS-related fatigue comes as result of the symptoms of MS that drain energy. Once secondary MS causes are ruled out, then the patient is deemed as having primary MS fatigue. Fatigue management is both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic. Occupational therapists are the major allied health providers that address the role fatigue plays in MS patients. Over the past two decades, numerous clinical trials have been conducted on drugs for treating MS-related fatigue. Of these agents, amantadine has been studied for the longest period, and has shown efficacy in about one third of patients with MS-related fatigue on several commonly used scales. Two randomized -trials of the central nervous system stimulant pemoline have yielded unimpressive results; efficacy was seen at higher doses but coupled with an unacceptable risk of adverse events. The wake-promoting agent modafinil is the only agent to show efficacy compared with placebo on the Fatigue Severity Scale, a measure that is highly resistant to "impulse answering" and is thus viewed as one of the most difficult scales on which to show -benefit. This article reviews fatigue in MS and proposes a rational strategy for evaluation and management of this most common MS symptom.