The association of ICRS and PRK for treating high astigmatism after keratoplasty improved visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and topographic and refractive astigmatism after 12 months of follow-up.
Purpose: Epidemiological analysis of limbal transplantation surgeries performed in the Ophthalmologic Hospital of Sorocaba. Methods: Retrospective medical records review of 30 patients who underwent limbal stem cell transplants between January 2003 and March 2008. Cases involving conjunctival limbal autograft were classified as group I, and those involving conjunctival limbal allograft as group II. Results: Two patients were excluded due to incomplete data during postoperative follow-up. Of the total sample of 28 patients, 53.6% constituted group I, whereas 46.4% were included in group II. Males were predominant (67.9%), and right eyes were the most prevalent (67.9%). The mean age was 40.3 years. Unilateral cases accounted for 60.7%. The most frequent pathology causing limbal system failure was chemical burns (53%). The mean length of time from diagnosis to surgery was 11.18 years. The limbal graft and amniotic membrane were associated in 75% of all cases, and tarsorrhaphy in 57.1%. The average follow-up period was 24.84 months. The uncorrected visual acuity improved in 38% of the cases, was unchanged in 28.5%, and deteriorated in 33.3%. There was no persistent epithelial defect in 75% of the patients. The conjunctivalization rate was similar between the groups (53.3% and 58.3%, respectively). The transparency improved in only 38.4% of the cases, and 28.5% of the surgeries performed were successful. The most prevalent complication was persistent epithelial defect, which occurred in 25% of the patients, followed by corneal melting in 14.2%. Other complications observed included infectious ulcers, limbal graft necrosis or ischemia, perforation, and descemetocele. Conclusion: Chemical burns remain the main cause of limbal stem cell deficiency. In these cases, limbal transplantation is the standard procedure to restore the ocular surface even though the success rate is low. Keywords
Purpose: To present an alternative technique (Pachy-DSEK) for the manual preparation of thin endothelial lamellae in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), as well as to evaluate its visual and anatomic outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 15 cases who underwent DSEK at a private eye clinic in Brazil (INOB, Brasília) from June 2017 to December 2019. All patients had ocular comorbidities and relative contraindications to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). All endothelial lamellae were manually prepared by using a standardized technique. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tomographic parameters and graft’s thickness were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months. Endothelial cell counts were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 to 24 months. Results: During preparation there was one case (6%) of peripheral tear and no tissue was lost. At 6 months, the median BCVA improved from 1.60 to 0.40 logMAR ( p = 0.0009). There was no significant change in anterior ( p = 0.507) and posterior astigmatism ( p = 0.483), anterior ( p = 0.683) and posterior mean keratometry ( p = 0.767), and total corneal power ( p = 0.952). The median central graft thickness at 6 months was 80 µm. Ultrathin grafts (<130 µm) were achieved in 80% of cases. At 12 to 24 months endothelial cell count decreased significantly. Graft’s detachment occurred in two cases (13%) and endothelial rejection in one case (6%). Conclusion: By using ultrasonic pachymetry intra-operatively and standardizing graft preparation, most manually dissected endothelial lamellae were ultrathin. Pachy-DSEK was safe and effective for treating endothelial disfunction in eyes with ocular comorbidities. It may be a cost-effective alternative to automated dissection methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.