ObjectiveUterine transposition has emerged as an alternative for fertility preservation in women with pelvic malignancies that require radiotherapy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing uterine transposition after trachelectomy for cervical cancer or before chemoradiation for vaginal cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with early stage cervical cancer after radical trachelectomy or with vaginal cancer with indication for pelvic radiation who had uterine transposition performed as fertility sparing strategy.ResultsFour patients with cervical cancer and one patient with vaginal cancer were included. Median age was 32 years (range 28–38). All patients had squamous cell carcinomas. All patients with cervical cancer had radical trachelectomies with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLN). Two of these patients also had pelvic lymphadenectomies. Indications for adjuvant radiotherapy was due to Sedlis criteria in two patients and to lymph node metastasis in the other two patients. The patient with stage IIB vaginal cancer was recommended primary chemoradiation. All patients underwent uterine transposition before radiotherapy. The median uterine transposition surgical time was 90 min (range 80-205) and no early complications (30 days) occurred. Average time from uterine transposition to start of radiotherapy was 16 days (10–28). After radiation, the uterus along with the ovaries and tubes were repositioned and the residual cervix sutured to the vagina. One patient declined uterine reimplantation after radiation and underwent a hysterectomy. After a median follow-up of 25 months (range 1–30), all patients were without evidence of disease. All patients with preserved uterus have normal menses after treatment. One patient has attempted to conceive with IVF techniques without success.ConclusionsUterine transposition may be an option in selected patients with cervical and vaginal cancers who want to preserve fertility. However, further studies that address its oncological safety and obstetrical outcomes are encouraged.

BackgroundGrowing evidence suggest that sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in endometrial cancer accurately detects lymph node metastasis. However, prospective randomized trials addressing the oncological outcomes of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer without lymphadenectomy are lacking.Primary ObjectivesThe present study aims to confirm that SLN biopsy without systematic node dissection does not negatively impact oncological outcomes.Study HypothesisWe hypothesized that there is no survival benefit in adding systematic lymphadenectomy to sentinel node mapping for endometrial cancer staging. Additionally, we aim to evaluate morbidity and impact in quality of life (QoL) after forgoing systematic lymphadenectomy.Trial DesignThis is a collaborative, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial. After total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and SLN biopsy, patients will be randomized (1:1) into: (a) no further lymph node dissection or (b) systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.Major Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaInclusion criteria are patients with high-grade histologies (endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma), endometrioid G1 or G2 with imaging concerning for myometrial invasion of ≥50% or cervical invasion, clinically suitable to undergo systematic lymphadenectomy.Primary Endpoint(s)The primary objective is to compare 3-year disease-free survival and the secondary objectives are 5-year overall survival, morbidity, incidence of lower limb lymphedema, and QoL after SLN mapping ± systematic lymphadenectomy in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer.Sample size178 participants will be randomized in this study with an estimated date for completing accrual of December 2024 and presenting results in 2027.Trial Registration NumberNCT03366051.

Objectives In locally-advanced cervical cancer (LACC), platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been the standardof-care treatment for >20 years. CALLA is the first global Phase 3 study evaluating immune checkpoint inhibition (durvalumab) versus placebo in combination with and following CRT in LACC (NCT03830866). Methods Newly-diagnosed, untreated patients with LACC (FIGO 2009 stages IB2-IIB node positive, IIIA-IVA with any node status) were randomized 1:1 to durvalumab (1500 mg IV) or placebo Q4W, for a total of up to 24 months, in combination with and following CRT. CRT comprised concurrent weekly IV cisplatin with EBRT and brachytherapy. RT quality was monitored, with variations evaluated for clinical significance. The primary endpoint is PFS; secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, local/distant disease progression incidence, and safety. Results 770 patients were randomized (N=385 per arm) at 120 sites in 15 countries. Median age was 49 years; median follow-up was 18.5 months. Durvalumab+CRT did not show a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs placebo+CRT (HR 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.08]; P=0.174); there was no detriment to OS, although data were immature and not formally tested. Adverse events of grade 3-4 occurred in 51.7% and 51.0% of patients in the durvalumab+CRT and placebo+CRT arms, respectively; 12.5% and 9.6% of patients discontinued treatment due to AEs possibly related to study drug. Conclusions Durvalumab in combination with and following CRT did not significantly improve PFS in patients with LACC. Safety of durvalumab+CRT was generally comparable to CRT alone, with no new or unexpected toxicity. Funding: AstraZeneca.

Conclusions LSR is associated with tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and poor prognosis in EC. Anti-LSR mAb is a potential therapeutic agent which induces apoptosis and shows a significant antitumor effect in EC.