Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains are a significant cause of nosocomial infections in predisposed patients. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) has been validated recently by use of a global strain collection. In this report, we applied MLVA together with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to type 14 isolates from three clusters of patients colonized or infected with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and another 10 epidemiologically unrelated isolates from the same hospital. The clusters could be distinguished by all three typing methods, which proved to be concordant. PFGE patterns provided the highest resolution. We observed seven sequence types (ST), six MLVA types (MT), and nine distinct ST/MT combinations. The combination of MLST and MLVA may be an alternative to PFGE in hospital epidemiology, providing the benefits of high accuracy, reproducibility, and portability.
We evaluated the ability of the new VITEK 2 version 4.01 software to identify and detect glycopeptideresistant enterococci compared to that of the reference broth microdilution method and to classify them into the vanA, vanB, vanC1, and vanC2 genotypes. Moreover, the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing with agents with improved potencies against glycopeptide-resistant enterococci was determined. A total of 121 enterococci were investigated. The new VITEK 2 software was able to identify 114 (94.2%) enterococcal strains correctly to the species level and to classify 119 (98.3%) enterococci correctly to the glycopeptide resistance genotype level. One Enterococcus casseliflavus strain and six Enterococcus faecium vanA strains with low-level resistance to vancomycin were identified with low discrimination, requiring additional tests. One of the vanA strains was misclassified as the vanB type, and one glycopeptide-susceptible E. facium wild type was misclassified as the vanA type. The overall essential agreements for antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were 94.2% for vancomycin, 95.9% for teicoplanin, 100% for quinupristin-dalfopristin and moxifloxacin, and 97.5% for linezolid. The rates of minor errors were 9% for teicoplanin and 5% for the other antibiotic agents. The identification and susceptibility data were produced within 4 h to 6 h 30 min and 8 h 15 min to 12 h 15 min. In conclusion, use of VITEK 2 version 4.01 software appears to be a reliable method for the identification and detection of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci as well as an improvement over the use of the former VITEK 2 database. However, a significant reduction in the detection time would be desirable.The first glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) that harbored the vanA transposon were identified in 1987 in Europe (10). Within 10 years GRE represented Ͼ25% of the enterococci that cause bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in the United States (2). The vanA and vanB genotypes (two genetically distinct forms of resistance) are recognized to be clinically important, whereas GRE strains harboring the intrinsic resistance genes vanC1 and vanC2 seem to play a less important clinical role. Contrary to the rates in other countries, the rates of GRE in German hospitals are low and GRE account for only about 1% of enterococcal isolates (8), but increasing rates in stool and clinical samples were reported recently (1, 17). Moreover, the numbers of nosocomial infections and the rates of transmission of GRE have increased (17). As GRE infections appear to be more deadly and more costly than infections caused by vancomycin-susceptible strains (15), rapid and reliable results of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are necessary for the adequate treatment of infections caused by GRE and the prevention of transmission of GRE strains.Many laboratories worldwide have adopted the VITEK automated system (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) for the detection of GRE strains in routine clinical microbiology. E...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.