The amount of available bone in the lower incisor region is critical for periodontal preservation when planning large anteroposterior dental movements. The aims of this study were to evaluate bone limits of the lower incisors in the mandibular symphysis and to verify whether they are influenced by facial growth patterns, lower incisor inclinations, skeletal anteroposterior relationships, or patient age. Tomographic images of 40 orthodontically untreated patients were evaluated and measurements of width and height of the mandibular symphysis, thickness on the lingual and labial sides of the alveolar bone, and thickness of the entire alveolar bone were performed in sagittal view. The following cephalometric measurements were also evaluated: growth pattern (FHI), lower incisor inclination (IMPA), and skeletal anteroposterior relationships (AO-BO). Pearson's correlation test was used to assess associations among bone measurements, cephalometric measurements, and patients' ages. Weak to moderate positive correlations between FHI and bone measurements on the labial side of the incisors and total alveolar width were found. The height of the symphysis had a moderate negative correlation with FHI. It was concluded that patient age, FHI, and IMPA influenced bone limits of the lower incisors in the mandibular symphysis, while AO-BO had no influence.
The aim of this study was to evaluate enamel roughness, quality of the enamel surfaces and time duration comparing different orthodontic adhesive removal protocols. Premolars were used to test three adhesive removal methods (n = 20): five-blade carbide bur, 30-blade carbide bur, and ultrasonic diamond bur. Bracket was bonded using TransbondTM XT adhesive. Roughness with different parameters was measured before bracket bonding and after adhesive remnants removal. Micromorphological analysis of enamel surface (n = 5) was performed by SEM images and categorized in enamel damage index—“perfect”; “satisfying”; “imperfect”; and “unacceptable”. Time was measured in seconds. All removal methods caused increased roughness in relation to Ra, Rq, and Rz parameters (X axis) comparing to healthy enamel surface. Enamel surface resulted from removal using five-blade burs was scored as satisfactory. Carbide bur groups decreased the roughness values of Ra, Rq, and Rz parameters on the Y axis and enamel surface was considered unacceptable. The 30-blade group increased symmetry (Rsk) and flattening (Rku) parameters of roughness and surface was scored as unsatisfactory. Diamond bur removed adhesive in 54.8 s, faster than five-blade carbide bur. The five-blade bur group resulted in less enamel roughness than the 30-blade and diamond groups.
INTRODUÇÃO: a evolução da Imaginologia na Odontologia propiciou uma série de vantagens para o diagnóstico e elaboração de planos de tratamento em diversas especialidades. Exames como ressonância magnética nuclear, tomografia computadorizada e tomografia volumétrica Cone Beam, bem como métodos de reconstrução em 3D, permitiram analisar de forma precisa estruturas orofaciais.Aliado a esse fato,com a realização de estudos clínicos com metodologias e desenhos adequados, pode-se avaliar os efeitos do tratamento ortodôntico sobre a articulação temporomandibular (ATM). OBJETIVO: esse trabalho, através de uma revisão sistemática de literatura, teve como objetivo analisar a inter-relação entre o tratamento ortodôntico e a ATM, verificando se a Ortodontia acarreta alguma alteração das estruturas internas da ATM. MÉTODOS: levantamento em bases de pesquisa (MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, Pubmed, Lilacs e BBO), entre os anos de 1966 e 2009, com enfoque em estudos clínicos randomizados, estudos longitudinais prospectivos não randomizados, revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises. RESULTADOS: após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, chegou-se a 14 artigos, sendo que 2 eram estudos clínicos randomizados e 12 eram estudos longitudinais sem critérios de randomização. CONCLUSÕES: pela análise da literatura, conclui-se que a realização do tratamento ortodôntico não ocorre à custa de posicionamentos não fisiológicos do côndilo e disco articular. Algumas mecânicas podem acarretar remodelações dos componentes ósseos articulares.
OBJECTIVE: Orthodontics as an option for treatment and prevention of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) is a topic that has generated discussion over time. While an occlusion current defends Orthodontics as an alternative to treatment, another current defends more conservative and reversible treatments. The objective of this study, through a systematic literature review, was to analyze the relationship between Orthodontics and TMD, checking the effects of orthodontic therapy in treatment and prevention of TMD. METHODS: Survey in research bases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, Pubmed, Lilacs and BBO, between the years of 1966 and May 2009, with focus in randomized clinical trials, non-randomized prospective longitudinal studies, systematic reviews and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: After application of the inclusion criteria 11 articles were selected, 9 which were non-randomized prospective longitudinal studies, 1 randomized clinical trial and 1 systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: According to the literature, there is a lack of specific studies that evaluated Orthodontics as an option for treatment and prevention of TMD. Thus the data conclude that there is no significant scientific evidences that orthodontic treatment treats or prevents TMD
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.