Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue archives are the largest and longest time-spanning collections of patient material in pathology archives. Methods to disclose information with molecular techniques, such as array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) have rapidly developed but are still not optimal. Array comparative genomic hybridisation is one efficient method for finding tumour suppressors and oncogenes in solid tumours, and also for classification of tumours. The fastest way of analysing large numbers of tumours is through the use of archival tissue samples with first, the huge advantage of larger median follow-up time of patients studied and second, the advantage of being able to locate and analyse multiple tumours, even across generations, from related individuals (families). Unfortunately, DNA from archival tissues is not always suitable for molecular analysis due to insufficient quality. Until now, this quality remained undefined. We report the optimisation of a genomic-DNA isolation procedure from FFPE pathology archives in combination with a subsequent multiplex PCR-based quality-control that simply identified all samples refractory to further DNA-based analyses. British Journal of Cancer (2006) Cancer cytogenetics has benefited greatly from the introduction of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) for mapping chromosomal gains and losses at a genome-wide scale (Kallioniemi et al, 1993;Gray et al, 1994). Subsequent development of the technique into array-CGH (also named matrix-CGH) has allowed increased automation, improved reproducibility and precision due to more accurate mapping of aberrations. This technology has been applied successfully to characterise congenital abnormalities at unprecedented precision (Veltman et al, 2002) and to characterise and classify tumours (Wessels et al, 2002;Nessling et al, 2005).In most pathology laboratories, large archives of formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) material are often the only source of material for cancer research. It is our experience (Wessels et al, 2002;Van Beers et al, 2005) that a proportion of archival specimens appears unsuited for aCGH analysis, which is troublesome because array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) experiments are tedious and expensive. In the past, we have noticed that this was not solved by repeating aCGH experiments, even when DNA was isolated from new sections from the same tissue blocks (Van Beers et al, 2005). Nevertheless, it is possible to obtain high-quality data using archival DNA samples in array CGH experiments (Figure 1) (Gray et al, 1994;Ried et al, 1995;Albertson and Pinkel, 2003;Heidenblad et al, 2004;Loo et al, 2004;Devries et al, 2005), even from 20-year-old tissue blocks, provided that robust procedures, high-quality reagents and 'good' sample DNA quality are being used. A 'good sample quality' definition and an assay to determine this FFPE DNA sample quality would therefore be of great value.Molecular biological assays, including aCGH on FFPE archival specimens, would be more eff...
Phosphorylation of oestrogen receptor α at serine 305 (ERαS305-P) induces tamoxifen resistance in experimental studies, but does not influence response to other endocrine agents, such as fulvestrant. We evaluated ERαS305-P using immunohistochemistry in 377 breast carcinomas from premenopausal participants of a randomized trial (n = 248) and patients with advanced disease (n = 129). Among the premenopausal patients, adjuvant tamoxifen improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ERαS305-P-negative tumours (multivariate HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.86, p = 0.010), but not for ERαS305-P-positive tumours (multivariate HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.33-3.05, p = 0.99) (interaction p = 0.131). Notably, ERαS305-P was not significantly associated with RFS in patients not treated with tamoxifen (multivariate HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.30-1.37, p = 0.248), indicating that ERαS305-P is a marker for treatment outcome rather than tumour progression. Given the direct experimental link between ERαS305-P and tamoxifen resistance and these first clinical data suggesting that premenopausal patients with ERαS305-P-positive breast cancer are resistant to adjuvant tamoxifen, further research is encouraged to study whether alternative endocrine treatment should be considered for this subgroup.
MethodsUsing immunohistochemistry, a score including PAK1 and co-expression of PKA and ER S305-P (PKA/ ER S305-P) was developed on a training set consisting of 103 patients treated with tamoxifen for metastatic disease, and validated on 231 patients randomized between adjuvant tamoxifen or no treatment. ResultsIn the training set, PAK1 levels were associated with tumor progression after tamoxifen (HR 1.57, 95% CI 0.99-2.48), as was co-expression of PKA and ER S305-P (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.14-3.52). In the validation set, a significant tamoxifen benefit was found among the 73% patients negative for PAK1 and PKA/ER S305-P (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.87), while others (27%) were likely to have no benefit from tamoxifen (HR 0.88, 95% 0.42-1.82). The test for interaction showed a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between groups defined by PAK1 and PKA/ER S305-P (p=0.037). Elevated PAK1 and PKA/ ER S305-P appeared to influence tamoxifen sensitivity. Conclusion 3Both PAK1 and PKA/ER S305-P levels were associated with sensitivity to tamoxifen in breast tumors and the combination of these variables should be considered in predicting tamoxifen benefit.
BackgroundWith an estimated 13,000 newly diagnosed patients per year, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common types of cancer in males in Indonesia. Moreover, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. This study aimed to explore the health behaviors of patients diagnosed with NPC and the possible causes of patient delay in NPC diagnosis.MethodsA qualitative research method was used to gain better insight into patient behaviors. Twelve patients were interviewed using semi-structured interview guidelines. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to a standard content analysis framework.ResultsMost patients had limited knowledge regarding NPC and its causes. Fifty percent of the patients had a delay of six months from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis. The main reason for this delay was the lack of awareness among the patients, which was influenced by their environment, economic status, family, culture, and religion. The perceived barriers to seeking medical help included direct non-medical costs not covered by health insurance, complex and time-consuming insurance and referral systems, and negative experiences in the past. Health insurance did motivate people to seek medical help.ConclusionThis study provides additional insight into patients’ motivations to delay seeking medical help and can facilitate the design of NPC education programs. To improve awareness of the abovementioned causes for delay, community-based education programs are highly warranted and should focus on the recognition of NPC symptoms and possible solutions to overcome the main barriers at an earlier disease stage.
Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), endemic in Southeast Asia, lacks effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Even in high-income countries the 5-year survival rate for stage IV NPC is less than 40%. Here we report high somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) expression in multiple clinical cohorts comprising 402 primary, locally recurrent and metastatic NPCs. We show that SSTR2 expression is induced by the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) via the NF-κB pathway. Using cell-based and preclinical rodent models, we demonstrate the therapeutic potential of SSTR2 targeting using a cytotoxic drug conjugate, PEN-221, which is found to be superior to FDA-approved SSTR2-binding cytostatic agents. Furthermore, we reveal significant correlation of SSTR expression with increased rates of survival and report in vivo uptake of the SSTR2-binding 68Ga-DOTA-peptide radioconjugate in PET-CT scanning in a clinical trial of NPC patients (NCT03670342). These findings reveal a key role in EBV-associated NPC for SSTR2 in infection, imaging, targeted therapy and survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.