No abstract

Carfentrazone-ethyl is embedded in guar gum to prepare a polymer–herbicide conjugate gel formulation for a sustained release of the active ingredient (a.i.). The sprayable gel formulation was optimized at 0.5% (w/v) concentration. Strong interactions of the prepared composition of the polymer–herbicide conjugate system are shown through spectroscopic techniques, depicting the peak broadening of hydrophilic −OH bonds in the herbicide at 1743 cm –1 , shifting to 1730 cm –1 in the polymer–herbicide sample. There is a broadening and shifting of the peak at 329 nm for the n → π* transition at 335 nm in the polymer–herbicide conjugate system in UV spectra. Differential scanning calorimetric measurements show a lowering of endothermic melting peaks to 242 and 303 °C in the polymer–herbicide conjugate. X-ray diffraction studies showed a sharp diffraction peak of the pure polymer at a 2θ of ∼20.3°, while broadening and shifting of the peak position to a 2θ of ∼20.8° were observed after adding the herbicide. Diffusion of the active ingredient in the polymer–herbicide conjugate resulted in much greater coverage (most of the weed leaf stomata (>95%)) than conventional spraying. The efficacy of both the polymer–herbicide formulation and herbicide at different doses in weed nurseries showed significantly higher weed mortality in Anagallis arvensis (95.4%), Chenopodium album (∼97%), and Ageratum conyzoides (93.16%) treated with the polymer–herbicide formulation @ 20 g a.i. ha –1 . Narrow SPAD readings range of A. arvensis (0.1–30.6) and that of C. album (0–5) were observed in the polymer–herbicide formulation @ 20 g a.i. ha –1 was at par with the conventional formulation @ 30 g a.i. ha –1 . Less regeneration in a weed nursery of A. arvensis (27%), C. album (77%), and A. conyzoides (49%) treated with gel formulations @ 20 g a.i. ha –1 was observed, which was significantly lower than those in conventional herbicides.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract