The early work of Aschoff, Ribbert, Goldmann and Kiyono showed that colloidal dyes are removed from the blood stream by the reticulo-endothelial system. Phenoltetrachlorphthalein, a colloidal dye, was shown by Schellong and Eisler' to remain longer than normally in the blood stream of rabbits following India ink injection or splenectomy and Saxl and Donath2 obtained similar results after electrocollargol injections in humans. Merklen, Wolf and Arnovl jevitch3 and Fiessinger and Longchampt4 believed this dye to be a test of the reticulo-endothelial system rather than of the liver.Bromsulphalein, introduced by Rosenthal and White,5 to estimate liver function is supposed to circulate as a soluble dye and to be more specifically excreted by the liver than phenoltetrachlorphthalein. Herlitz,G however, on the basis of clinical investigations, called attention to the possibility that bromsulphalein might be excreted through the reticulo-endothelial system in general and Kupff er cells in particular rather than through the hepatic parenchyma. T o investigate this we performed bromsulphalein tests on dogs which had been splenectomized or had received India ink injections.Control dye tests were done on 11 apparently normal animals.
CHICAGOWhen newborn infants succumb to severe infection during the first few days of life, predisposing maternal factor such as infection, prolonged labor, and premature rupture of amniotic membranes have been implicated.1,2 Several reports have indicated a direct correlation between early rupture of the amniotic membranes and neonatal infection, especially in association with prolonged labor. [3][4][5]8 However, the beneficial effects of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of infection in the newborn under these circumstances still are not clear. VonFriesen reported that small doses of sulfamerazine,6 and Smith and his co-workers, that a combination of penicillin and tetra-cycline7 resulted in decreased neonatal morbidity and rate of infection when administered to mothers with fever, prolonged labor, and premature rupture of amniotic membranes. Blanc 8 and Pfaeffli,9 however, did not observe a beneficial effect when penicillin and streptomycin were used as the prophylactic antibiotics.Equivocal results have been reported when prophylactic antibiotics were administered to full-term infants born after premature rup¬ ture of the amniotic membranes.1012 Al¬ though it is generally agreed that premature infants are more susceptible to infection than full-term infants, Silverman 13 pointed out that there is still insufficient evidence to warrant administration of prophylactic anti¬ biotics to premature infants who have been exposed to amnionitis.Our study was undertaken to determine whether prophylactic administration of peni¬ cillin and streptomycin would prevent infec¬ tion in premature infants who were born after premature rupture of the amniotic membranes. Subjects and MethodsService infants admitted to the Michael Reese Hospital premature nursery, with rupture of amniotic membranes more than 18 hours prior to delivery according to history, were chosen for the study if they fulfilled the following require¬ ments : ( 1 ) infant's age was under 24 hours at the time of admission, (2) absence of a history of maternal fever, purulent vaginal discharge, or antibiotic treatment, (3) absence of severe con¬ genital anomalies, respiratory distress syndrome, or other illness requiring specific therapy.Shortly after admission the following specimens for bacterial cultures were obtained from each infant: (1) venous blood from the antecubital vein obtained by the technique described by Eitz-man1* wherein hexachlorophene pHisoHex, 1% tincture of iodine, and 70% ethyl alcohol were used as sterilizing agents, (2) nasopharyngeal swab, (3) throat swab, (4) cord stump swab, (5) stool by rectal swab, and (6) gastric aspirate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.