RAI is a safe and effective option for treatment of children and adolescents with Graves' disease. In light of the rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism seen at our center with thyroidectomy and previously published long-term safety of RAI, we recommend RAI as the first line treatment for children and adolescents with Graves' disease. For those centers performing thyroidectomies, we recommend that each center select 1-2 high-volume pediatric surgeons to perform all thyroid procedures, allowing individuals to increases case volume and potentially decrease long-term complications of thyroidectomy.

Background: Treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with monoclonal anti- tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) can result in immunogenicity and formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). ADAs are associated with loss of clinical response and worsening disease progression. Data examining treatment interventions to overcome ADA in pediatric patients with IBD are lacking. Results: Medical records were reviewed from 234 children and adolescents with IBD treated with infliximab or adalimumab who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (626 tests). All patients who had detectable antibodies were further analyzed. A total 58 patients (24.8%) developed ADA while being treated with infliximab or adalimumab. The incidence of antibody development was 12.9 per 100 person-years of anti-TNF treatment. Twenty-eight patients underwent dose optimization and 54% had undetectable ADA on follow-up monitoring. The mean duration of antibody suppression was 16.8 ± 10.9 months in those who were successfully suppressed with optimization. Patients who switched to a second anti-TNF medication were not more likely to develop antibodies to the second agent. Conclusions: With limited therapies for IBD and the chronicity of the disease, we advocate salvage of the current anti-TNF through dose optimization in pediatric patients with antibody level <10 U/mL.

Introduction:This study was designed to evaluate outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as compared with an American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) complexity grade-matched adult cohort.Method:In this retrospective case-control study, ERCPs performed in pediatric patients from January 2008 to December 2018 in 2 tertiary referral hospitals were compared with a complexity-matched adult control group with similar procedural indications. Primary outcomes included the clinical success rate, technical success rate, and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included postprocedural admission rates, mode of sedation, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, hospitalization length, and the number of repeat procedures.Results:Two hundred thirty-two ERCPs performed in 110 pediatric patients (average age 13.3) and 318 ERCPs performed in 160 ASGE grade-matched adult controls (average age 47.2 years) were analyzed. All procedures were therapeutic. There was no difference in the technical success rate (P = 0.2), clinical success rate (P = 0.5), complication rates (P = 0.1), and fluoroscopy time (P = 0.4), between the pediatric and adult cohorts. General anesthesia use and length of stay were significantly higher in the pediatric group (P = 0.0001). In subgroup analysis, technical (P = 0.2) and clinical success (P = 0.2) as well as complication rates (P = 0.6) were comparable between patients 10 years or less and patients 11 to 18 years within pediatric cohort.Conclusions:ERCP in pediatric cohorts appears to be safe and effective with equivalent outcomes relative to an ASGE complexity-matched adult cohort. Pediatric patients are more likely to require general anesthesia and have a longer average length of stay relative to adult controls.