The effects of noise on 7- to 11-month-old infants' speech-sound discrimination (/ba/vs/ga/) were determined using a conditioned head-turn procedure. Variation in performance as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was estimated by testing each infant at four S/N's (-8, 0, 8, and 16 dB). Adults were tested for comparison at four S/N's (-12, -8, -4, and 0 dB). The S/N's were chosen based on pilot data. Performance varied monotonically with S/N for both age groups, but infants required greater S/N than adults to achieve comparable levels of performance. Both groups were also tested using an adaptive (1-up, 1-down) threshold procedure with a 3-dB step size. There was a group mean difference in threshold of 5.8-dB S/N favoring the adults. Weighted group psychometric functions, derived from the responses obtained in the adaptive runs, showed good correspondence with the data points at the four S/N's. The slopes of these functions were the same (7.5%/dB) for infants and adults. The results suggest that infants are at a greater disadvantage than adults when processing speech in noise and that concern over the effects of a noisy environment on the acquisition of language is justified. In addition, the adaptive threshold procedure can be used as an efficient way to estimate the limits of discrimination ability as a function of S/N or intensity, both for individual subjects and for groups of subjects, in developmental research.

Infants were tested on a speech-sound discrimination-in-noise task using the visual reinforcement infant speech discrimination (VRISD) procedure with an adaptive (up-down) threshold protocol. An adult control group was tested using the same stimuli and apparatus. The speech sounds were synthetic /ba/ and /ga/. The masker was band-passed noise presented continuously at 48 dB SPL. Test-retest reliability was good for both groups, although test-retest differences were smaller for adults. For infants the mean of the absolute values of the differences between tests was only 5.2 dB, and there was less than a 10-dB difference between the two tests of 14 (87.5%) of the 16 infants completing the study. The infant-adult difference in discrimination threshold in noise was 6.9 dB, which agrees well with detection-in-noise thresholds from earlier studies and with discrimination-in-noise thresholds obtained on a subset of subjects in our earlier work. Advantages of the adaptive threshold procedure and its possible applications both in research studies and in the clinic are discussed.

Three investigations were conducted to determine the application of the articulation index (AI) to the prediction of speech performance of hearing-impaired subjects as well as of normal-hearing listeners. Speech performance was measured in quiet and in the presence of two interfering signals for items from the Speech Perception in Noise test in which target words are either highly predictable from contextual cues in the sentence or essentially contextually neutral. As expected, transfer functions relating the AI to speech performance were different depending on the type of contextual speech material. The AI transfer function for probability-high items rises steeply, much as for sentence materials, while the function for probability-low items rises more slowly, as for monosyllabic words. Different transfer functions were also found for tests conducted in quiet or white noise rather than in a babble background. A majority of the AI predictions for ten individuals with moderate sensorineural loss fell within +/- 2 standard deviations of normal listener performance for both quiet and babble conditions.

No abstract

Infant ability to discriminate a speech-sound pair in noise was assessed using the visual reinforcement infant speech discrimination procedure. Sixteen infants between 7 and 12 months were tested on the /ba-ga/ contrast at four S/N's (− 8, 0, 8, and 16 dB). A group of young-adult control subjects was tested also at four S/N's (− 12, − 8, − 4, and 0 dB). The noise was continuously present at 48 dB SPL. Group psychometric functions revealed that infants required a more favorable S/N than adults to achieve given levels of performance. The adult subjects and 14 of the 16 infants were also tested using a discrimination-threshold procedure in which the stimulus intensity was varied adaptively (1-up/1-down). The adaptive discrimination procedure provided, for both groups, estimates of performance that are in good agreement with those from the performance versus S/N functions that were developed using the more time-consuming method of trial blocks at fixed S/N's. [Work supported by DRF and NIH POI NS16337.]