Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) restricts food intake, and when the Roux limb is elongated to 150 cm, the procedure is believed to induce malabsorption. Objective: Our objective was to measure total reduction in intestinal absorption of combustible energy after RYGB and the extent to which this was due to restriction of food intake or malabsorption of ingested macronutrients. Design: Long-limb RYGB was performed in 9 severely obese patients. Dietary intake and intestinal absorption of fat, protein, carbohydrate, and combustible energy were measured before and at 2 intervals after bypass. By using coefficients of absorption to measure absorptive function, equations were developed to calculate the daily gram and kilocalorie quantities of ingested macronutrients that were not absorbed because of malabsorption or restricted food intake. Results: Coefficients of fat absorption were 92 6 1.3% before bypass, 72 6 5.5% 5 mo after bypass, and 68 6 8.7% 14 mo after bypass. There were no statistically significant effects of RYGB on protein or carbohydrate absorption coefficients, although protein coefficients decreased substantially in some patients. Five months after bypass, malabsorption reduced absorption of combustible energy by 124 6 57 kcal/d, whereas restriction of food intake reduced energy absorption by 2062 6 271 kcal/d. Fourteen months after bypass, malabsorption reduced energy absorption by 172 6 60 kcal/d compared with 1418 6 171 kcal/d caused by restricted food intake. Conclusion: On average, malabsorption accounted for '6% and 11% of the total reduction in combustible energy absorption at 5 and 14 mo, respectively, after this gastric bypass procedure. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:704-13.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated clinical benefits across multiple solid tumor types; however, resistance and relapse often occur. New immunomodulatory targets, which are highly expressed in activated immune cells, are needed. MEDI0562, an agonistic humanized mAb, specifically binds to the costimulatory molecule OX40. This first-inhuman study evaluated MEDI0562 in adults with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods: In this phase I, multicenter, openlabel, single-arm, dose-escalation (3þ3 design) study, patients received 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10 mg/kg MEDI0562 through intravenous infusion every 2 weeks, until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective evaluated safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics.Results: In total, 55 patients received ≥1 dose of MEDI0562 and were included in the analysis. The most common tumor type was squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (47%). Median duration of treatment was 10 weeks (range, 2-48 weeks). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 67% of patients, most commonly fatigue (31%) and infusion-related reactions (14%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 14% of patients with no apparent dose relationship; no TRAEs resulted in death. Two patients had immune-related partial responses per protocol and 44% had stable disease. MEDI0562 induced increased Ki67 þ CD4 þ and CD8 þ memory T-cell proliferation in the periphery and decreased intratumoral OX40 þ FOXP3 þ cells.Conclusions: MEDI0562 was safely administered at doses up to 10 mg/kg in heavily pretreated patients. On-target pharmacodynamic effects were suggested in this setting. Further evaluation with immune checkpoint inhibitors is ongoing.

We report on 12 consecutive patients with advanced/metastatic Ewing's sarcoma who were treated as a separate cohort of a phase 1 trial of FANG autologous immunotherapy (1 × 106–2.5 × 107 cells/intradermal injection each month for minimum 4 months). Safety and clinical response were monitored. Patient immune response to unmodified autologous tumor cells was assessed by gamma interferon-enzyme-linked immunospot (γIFN-ELISPOT) assay using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from baseline (pretreatment) and multiple postvaccination time points. None of the 12 patients (47 vaccinations) developed grade 2/3/4 drug-related toxicity. Median product release granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression was 1,941 pg/106 cells, and TGFβ1and TGFβ2 knockdown were 99 and 100%, respectively. Eight patients were assessed for ELISPOT response to autologous tumor cells at baseline and all (100%) were negative. In contrast, follow-up ELISPOT response at month 1 or month 4 (one patient) after FANG was positive in all eight patients. One patient achieved a partial tumor response (38% tumor reduction, RECIST 1.1). The Kaplan–Meier estimated survival of these 12 patients at 1 year was 75%. In this phase 1 study in patients with Ewing's sarcoma, FANG immunotherapy was well tolerated, elicited a tumor-specific systemic immune response in all patients, and was associated with favorable 1-year survival. Further clinical testing is indicated.

Estrogen and its metabolites play a significant role in the proliferation of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors can significantly reduce estrogen levels by blocking enzyme-mediated estrogen synthesis within tissues. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors have now surpassed tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive, breast cancer, showing improved response rates and time to progression. Aromatase inhibitors have shown incremental improvements in disease-free survival, lower local recurrence rates, lower metastatic recurrence rates, and a lower incidence of contralateral breast cancer over tamoxifen when used in the adjuvant setting. Aromatase inhibitors are recommended to be used as adjuvant therapy within the first 5 years of hormonal therapy and may be used either upfront for 5 years or sequenced with tamoxifen. No superiority of one aromatase inhibitor over another has yet been shown. The side effect profiles of aromatase inhibitors have some key differences compared with tamoxifen. These differences may influence treatment choices as well as impact compliance.

2510 Background: SAR439459 is a human anti-TGFβ monoclonal antibody that neutralizes all isoforms of TGFβ. In preclinical models, combining SAR439459 with an anti-PD-1 showed improved anti-tumor activity compared to single agent. Here we report preliminary results of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab in a first in human study. Methods: This is an open-label study (dose escalation and expansion) of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab administered intravenously in adult patients with advanced solid tumors to determine safety and tolerability, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or maximum administered dose (MAD) of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab, pharmacokinetics (PK); pharmacodynamic (PD) and preliminary clinical benefit. In Part 1A, SAR439459 (0.05-15 mg/kg) was administered as monotherapy Q2W in an adaptive Bayesian design with overdose control. In Part 1B, SAR439459 doses cleared from monotherapy were administered in combination with fixed dose of cemiplimab (3 mg/kg Q2W or 350 mg Q3W) in a 3+3 design. Results: As of 31 January 2020, 28 (1A) and 24 (1B) patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1 with a median age of 60.5 and 63 years respectively were enrolled. In Part 1A, 25 patients (89.3%) had at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 15 (53.5%) experienced grade (G)≥ 3 events. In Part 1B, 22 patients (91.7%) had at least one TEAE and 14 (58.3%) experienced G ≥ 3 events. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluable in 24 and 21 patients respectively. In 1A, 2 DLTs were reported in 2 of 8 evaluable patients in dose level (DL) 4: G5 brain stem hemorrhage in a patient on concomitant low molecular weight heparin treatment and G3 myocardial infarction in a patient with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. In 1B, 1 of 6 evaluable patients in DL5 had DLTs (G3 ALT and AST increase). MTD was not reached in either part. Ten patients had best overall response of stable disease: 6 in 1A and 4 in 1B. The PK of SAR439459 was dose proportional over the dose range tested with no evidence of cemiplimab effect on SAR439459 PK, when given in combination. Treatment with SAR439459 ± cemiplimab led to rapid reduction in total plasma TGFβ level in all dose levels tested and induced CD8 & NK cells expansion and Th1 cytokines production, suggesting peripheral T cell activation. Preliminary results from paired tumor biopsies collected from patients treated with SAR439459 ± cemiplimab in expansion showed trend of TGFβ signaling pathway inhibition and conversion from excluded to inflamed tumor-immune phenotype. Conclusions: SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed an acceptable tolerability profile overall. MTD was not reached. Peripheral and tumor target engagement and modulation of key immune cells was observed in treated patients. Dose expansion cohorts are currently enrolling selected solid tumor patients. Funding: Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT03192345.