Detecting and monitoring blood loss is always a challenging dilemma in emergency settings. The diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC) in trauma patients may be useful in this way. This has been classically done with computed tomography (CT); however, doing it with ultrasound as a bedside easily available modality is a relatively novel approach. Between January 2006 and March 2006, 88 injured patients referred to our center were investigated. The patients were divided in to two groups: a shock group (n = 11, 12.5%) and a control group (n = 77, 87.5%) who were trauma patients with normal blood pressure. The maximum anteroposteroir diameter of IVC was measured ultrasonographically both in inspiration (i) and expiration (e) by M-mode in the subxyphoid area. The difference between the diameters of IVCe and IVCi was regarded as collapsibility, and collapsibility index was defined as IVCe - IVCi/IVCe. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and correlation analysis. The average diameters of IVCe and IVCi in the shock group at arrival were significantly smaller than in the control group (5.6 +/- 0.8 mm, 4.0 +/- 0.7 mm versus 11.9 +/- 2.2 mm, 9.6 +/- 2.0 mm; P < 0.0001). The maximum diameter of IVC in the shock group was in a 30-year-old male patient with an IVCe and IVCi of 7.0 and 5.3 mm, respectively. Correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between the diameter of IVCe (r = 0.72) and IVCi (r = 0.73) and the presence of shock. Regarding the collapsibility index, the mean collapsibility index of IVC was significantly higher in the shock group compared to patients in the control group (27% versus 20%; P < 0.001). The diameter of IVC was found to correlate with shock in trauma patients. The measurement of the IVC may be an important addition to the ultrasonographic evaluation of trauma and other potentially volume-depleted patients and can be added to the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) of the trauma patient with minimum additional time.

No abstract

There is an extensive spectrum of autoimmune entities that can involve the central nervous system, which has expanded with the emergence of new imaging modalities and several clinicopathologic entities. Clinical presentation is usually non-specific, and imaging has a critical role in the workup of these diseases. Immune-mediated diseases of the brain are not common in daily practice for radiologists and, except for a few of them such as multiple sclerosis, there is a vague understanding about differentiating them from each other based on the radiological findings. In this review, we aim to provide a practical diagnostic approach based on the unique radiological findings for each disease. We hope our diagnostic approach will help radiologists expand their basic understanding of the discussed disease entities and narrow the differential diagnosis in specific clinical scenarios. An understanding of unique imaging features of these disorders, along with laboratory evaluation, may enable clinicians to decrease the need for tissue biopsy.

No abstract