This study is one of the first more extensive patient series from a lower-middle income country (LMIC) to report outcomes following lower extremity vein bypass for chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Despite the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, limb threat severity, and many economic and resource constraints, overall outcomes exceed expectations, are within international benchmarks, and are similar to those reported from high income countries. These outcomes point to the feasibility and efficacy of a "vein bypass first strategy" for amputation prevention in lower-middle income resource limited countries.Objective: Although high quality epidemiological data are lacking, the global increase in chronic limb threatening ischaemia may be disproportionately affecting low and LMICs. All available data for outcomes from bypass for limb salvage are from high income countries, with none from LMIC settings where the challenge is greatest. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes following vein lower extremity bypass for chronic limb threatening ischaemia at the University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, and to compare patients and outcomes with those described in the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Objective Performance Goals (OPG) and United States National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Methods: Consecutive patients (n ¼ 367) undergoing SVS-OPG eligible lower extremity bypass between 2015 and 2017 were studied. Thirty day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE), deaths, and amputations are reported, along with one year overall survival, limb salvage, and amputation free survival.Results: Patients at University of Colombo had more diabetes mellitus (80% vs. SVS 57% vs. NSQIP 50%, p < .001) and tissue loss (100% vs. SVS 74% vs. NSQIP 59%, p < .001). The 30 day MALE was 7.6%, which is not a statistically significant difference from the SVS (6.1%) or NSQIP (9%). The 30 day MACE was 8.2%, statistically significantly higher than NSQIP (4.2%, p < .001) but not SVS (6.2%, p ¼ .20). At 12 months, the overall survival (82%) was within the OPG threshold, but limb salvage (81.8%) and amputation free survival (64.5%) were just outside. Conclusion: Outcomes following vein bypass for ischaemic necrosis at the University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, are acceptable and similar to those reported from high income countries despite greater limb threat severity and resource limitations. Further real world data from similar settings on outcomes following revascularisation are required. These data suggest that a vein bypass first strategy for advanced ischaemic necrosis is feasible and effective even in resource limited settings.

Non-traumatic, simultaneous pseudoaneurysms of the bilateral superficial femoral arteries (SFAs) are extremely rare. Spontaneous transection of the SFA is another unique pathology. Here, we present a patient with end stage kidney disease who was diagnosed with bilateral, simultaneous SFA pseudoaneurysms. He had a recent history of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus septicemia; therefore, infection was suspected to be the main cause. Complete transection of the SFA was noted during the operative exploration of the symptomatic left side. Wide debridement and autologous vein bypass were performed via a clean route. Unfortunately, two months later, recurrent surgical site infection caused distal anastomotic rupture and fatal sepsis.

No abstract

No abstract