The present study examines momentary experiences of happiness and meaning, two components of well-being, by using an experience sampling method. Participants included 603 Korean adults, who generated 24,430 responses over the course of 2–4 weeks. Results revealed that reported levels of happiness and meaning fluctuated substantially over the course of a day and that contextual factors, such as daily activities, social interaction partners, day of week, and time of day, along with demographic variables, were significant predictors of momentary happiness and meaning. In addition, we observe that people often experienced happiness and meaning independently of each other during a single daily event. In sum, momentary experiences of happiness and meaning were dynamic, related but distinct, and varied by individuals across daily events and over time.

Replications are important to science, but who will do them? One proposal is that students can conduct replications as part of their training. As a proof-of-concept for this idea, here we report a series of 11 pre-registered replications of findings from the 2015 volume of Psychological Science, all conducted as part of a graduate-level course.Congruent with larger, more systematic efforts, replications typically yielded smaller effects than originals: The modal outcome was partial support for the original claim.This work documents the challenges facing motivated students as they attempt to replicate previously published results on a first attempt. We describe the workflow and pedagogical methods that were used in the class and discuss implications both for the adoption of this pedagogical model and for replication research more broadly.Keywords: Replication; Reproducibility; Pedagogy; Experimental Methods REPLICATION THROUGH PEDAGOGY 3 Improving the Replicability of Psychological Science Through PedagogyReplicability is a core value for empirical research and there is increasing concern throughout psychology that more independent replication is necessary (Open Science Collaboration, 2015; Wagenmakers, Wetzels, Borsboom, Maas, & Kievit, 2012). Yet under the current incentive structure for science, replication is not typically valued for publication in top journals (Makel, Plucker, & Hegarty, 2012) or in metrics of research productivity (Koole & Lakens, 2012). One potential solution to this problem is to make replication an explicit part of pedagogy: that is, to teach students about experimental methods by asking them to run replication studies (Frank & Saxe, 2012; Grahe et al., 2012). Despite enthusiasm for this idea (Everett & Earp, 2015; M. King et al., 2016;LeBel, 2015;Standing, 2016), there is limited data beyond anecdotal reports and individual projects (Lakens, 2013; e.g., Phillips et al., 2015) to support its efficacy in producing wide-scale pedagogical adoption.In the current article, we describe the pedagogical and methodological approach to replication research taken in our graduate-level experimental methods course and address the practical barriers faced by instructors planning to incorporate replications into their courses. In our course, students conducted replications of published articles from the 2015 volume of the journal Psychological Science with rigorous instructor review at each major stage. The results of these replications are a microcosm of larger replication efforts, providing insight into both the difficulties of pedagogical replications and their promise as a method for improving the robustness of psychological research.We assess the challenges facing a student in choosing an article of interest and -in a single attempt, within constraints of budget, expertise, and effort -reproducing the findings. We consider a number of criteria for evaluating replication success, including statistical significance, effect size, a Bayesian measure of evidence (Etz & REPLICATION THROUG...

Counterattitudinal-argument generation is a powerful tool for opening people up to alternative views. On the basis of decades of research, it should be especially effective when people adopt the perspective of individuals who hold alternative views. In the current research, however, we found the opposite: In three preregistered experiments (total N = 2,734), we found that taking the perspective of someone who endorses a counterattitudinal view lowers receptiveness to that view and reduces attitude change following a counterattitudinal-argument-generation task. This ironic effect can be understood through value congruence: Individuals who take the opposition’s perspective generate arguments that are incongruent with their own values, which diminishes receptiveness and attitude change. Thus, trying to “put yourself in their shoes” can ultimately undermine self-persuasion. Consistent with a value-congruence account, this backfire effect is attenuated when people take the perspective of someone who holds the counterattitudinal view yet has similar overall values.

No abstract

In this conceptual article, we review three decades of research on time and meaning in consumer research and psychology to identify key themes that have emerged, build frameworks that integrate past research, and reveal areas of potential for future empirical exploration. We begin by carving out a conceptual understanding of meaning in life and identifying time as a key lens through which the pursuit of meaning can be viewed. We then review extant research on how to spend and construe time in ways that enhance meaning, relying on two frameworks—one anchored in three dimensions of meaning (purpose, mattering, and comprehension) and the other in three levels of time (momentary, day‐to‐day, and lifetime). We conclude by outlining several directions for future research focused on deepening our understanding of how consumers can think about and use their time in ways that boost their sense of meaning in life.