No abstract

Background DNA viruses such as HPV rely on K+ influx for replication. Both digoxin and furosemide inhibit the K+ influx by interacting with cell membrane ion co‐transporters (Na+/K+‐ATPase and Na+‐K+‐2Cl− co‐transporter‐1, respectively). We therefore hypothesized that these two compounds in a topical formulation may be valuable in the treatment of HPV‐induced warts. This new approach is called Ionic Contra‐Viral Therapy (ICVT).ObjectiveTo evaluate systemic exposure, safety and tolerability of ICVT with a combination of furosemide and digoxin after repeated topical application in subjects with common warts. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate pharmacodynamics effects of ICVT.MethodsTwelve healthy subjects with at least four common warts on their hands were included in the study and treated with a fixed dose of 980 mg topical gel containing 0.125% (w/w) digoxin and 0.125% (w/w) furosemide for 7 consecutive days on their lower back to assess safety and systemic exposure. Two warts were treated with 10 mg each and two served as negative controls to obtain preliminary evidence of treatment effect.Results ICVT was well tolerated topically, and there was no evidence of systemic exposure of digoxin or furosemide. There were no clinical relevant safety findings and no serious adverse events (SAEs). A rapid and statistically significant reduction in diameter, height and volume of the warts was already observed at day 14.Conclusion ICVT was found to be safe for administration to humans and 7 days of active treatment showed a statistical significant wart reduction compared to untreated control lesions, clearly indicating pharmacological activity.

Imiquimod (IMQ) is often used as a topical challenge agent to provoke local skin inflammation. The objective of this study was to develop and refine a rapid, temporary, and reversible human skin inflammation model with IMQ for application in clinical drug development. A randomized, vehicle‐controlled, open‐label, dose‐ranging study was conducted in 16 healthy male subjects. IMQ (5 mg) was applied once daily for 72 hours under occlusion to intact skin (n = 8) or tape stripped (TS) skin (n = 8). Although IMQ alone induced limited effects, TS+IMQ treatment showed larger responses in several domains, including erythema and perfusion (P < 0.0001), mRNA expression of inflammatory markers (P < 0.01), and inflammatory cell influx compared with vehicle. In conclusion, a rapid, human IMQ skin inflammation challenge model was successfully developed with a clear benefit of TS prior to IMQ application. Future interaction studies will enable proof‐of‐pharmacology of novel compounds targeting the innate immune system.

Background Assessment of treatment effects in clinical trials requires valid information on treatment adherence, adverse events and symptoms. Paper‐based diaries are often inconvenient and have limited reliability, particularly for outpatient trials. Objectives To investigate the utility of an electronic diary (e‐diary) application for patients with skin diseases in outpatient clinical trials. Methods An e‐diary application was developed and technically validated. Treatment adherence was defined as topical administration by the patient, and patient‐reported outcomes, i.e. pain and itch, were evaluated by the e‐diary in six clinical trials on newly tested topical drugs. Additionally, the proportion of patients capturing the applied topical drug by camera and filling in the pain and itch scores was defined as e‐diary adherence, and patients’ perception of usefulness and acceptability of the e‐diary were evaluated. Results Treatment adherence rates of the included 256 patients were high (median 98%, range 97–99%). E‐diary adherence was also high with a median of 93% (range 87–97%) for capturing the applied drug by camera, and 89% (range 87–96%) and 94% (range 87–96%) for entering respectively the itch and pain score. Daily symptom scores provided good insights into the disease burden, and patients rated the e‐diary as good to excellent with respect to user acceptability. Conclusions The results suggest that the e‐diary is an excellent way to ensure proper treatment administration, indicated by both the high user acceptability scores and high treatment adherence. Moreover, the e‐diary may also be valuable for frequent and reliable monitoring of patient‐reported outcomes in daily clinical practice.

Omiganan is an indolicidin analog with antimicrobial properties that could be beneficial for patients with atopic dermatitis. In this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase II trial we explored the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of topical omiganan once daily in 36 patients with mild to moderate atomic dermatitis. Patients were randomized to apply topical omiganan 1%, omiganan 2.5%, or vehicle gel to one target lesion once daily for 28 consecutive days. Small but significant improvements in local objective SCORing Atopic Dematitis index and morning itch were observed in the omiganan 2.5% group compared with the vehicle gel group (−18.5%; 95% confidence interval, −32.9 to −1.0; P = 0.04; and −8.2; 95% confidence interval, −16.3 to −0.2; P = 0.05, respectively). A shift from lesional to nonlesional skin microbiota was observed in both omiganan treatment groups, in contrast to the vehicle group. Thus, treatment with topical omiganan improved dysbiosis in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, and small but statistically significant improvements in clinical scores were detected. Our findings warrant further exploration in future clinical trials.