Ecosystems are open systems where energy fluxes produce modifications over plant communities. According to the state and transition model, plant formations are defined by changes in natural conditions and disturbs. Based on these changes, it is possible to define vectors that show the tendencies of the communities towards other states. Within the subregion of Arid Chaco, mature communities of Aspidosperma quebracho blanco represent the quasistable equilibrium communities or “climax,” similar to that observed in the Chancaní Natural Reserve (Córdoba, Argentina). Biodiversity values and Lyapunov coefficients were calculated based on plant abundance and cover data. Lyapunov coefficients were calculated as the Euclidean distance of each site with respect to reference condition (community of Aspidosperma quebracho blanco), representing for each state the necessary exergy to reach the reference condition. When Lyapunov coefficients decrease in time, it is expected for the system to drive towards a quasistationary state; otherwise, the equilibrium is unstable and becomes less resilient. The diversity of species has a significant effect over the resistance to perturbations but equivocal for the recovery rate. Lyapunov coefficients may be more precise succession indicators than biodiversity indexes, representing the amount of exergy needed for a vegetation state to reach the reference condition.
Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest among geographers in a critical perspective on studies of transportation and mobility, or studies that take into account the power relations within systems of transportation that produce space, place, mobility, and/or identity. This ever‐growing body of work includes people who might not consider themselves as transportation geographers per se, but nevertheless are expanding geographies of transportation beyond the traditional focus on vehicles, infrastructure, and economics. In this article, we review such work from three different perspectives: critical studies of professional practice, the interdisciplinary approach of Caribbean Studies, and the work of activists and scholar‐activists to connect environmental justice with mobility justice.
Soil and above-ground dead biomass are important carbon pools in drylands. They depend on local controls and patterns that should be studied. The objective of this work is to understand and quantify the influence of the vegetation canopy in the regulation of soil and dead biomass carbon stocks in woodlands of Monte region in Argentina. The hypothesis is that soil and dead biomass carbon stocks are lower in the intercanopy and higher under the canopy, independently of the type of canopy. Thirty sampling plots were selected, identifying three treatments: tree canopy, intercanopy and shrub canopy. In each sampling plot, soil and dead biomass were sampled. Four physiognomic-functional groups were identified. Prosopis woodlands accumulated about 38 Mg ha -1 of dead organic carbon (from soil, litter, and dead wood), followed by Suaeda woodlands with almost 35 Mg ha -1 . Mixed woodlands showed average values around 27 Mg ha -1 , while Bulnesia woodlands around 25 Mg ha -1 . The vegetation canopy, and consequently, litter and dead wood input affected soil organic carbon in topsoil. Shrubs such as Larrea spp. had a restricted ability to enrich soil compared to Prosopis spp. Soil, litter and dead wood are significant pools of carbon and should be included in programs on reducing emissions in arid regions. The hypothesis is accepted partially; there is a remarked contrast in carbon content between soils under the tree canopy and off the canopy. However, the effect of shrub canopy is intermediate between both treatments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.