Objective: This study was performed to confirm the efficacy of a 6-month therapy with a formulation of N-acetylcysteine (NAC; 600 mg/day p.o.) on frequency and severity of exacerbations in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: One hundred sixty-nine patients attending five Italian centres were recruited in an open, randomized, controlled study. The patients were randomly allocated to standard therapy plus NAC 600 mg once a day or standard therapy alone over a 6-month period. At baseline, medical history was evaluated, and physical examination was performed; occurrence and severity of exacerbations and side effects of NAC were analyzed after 3 and 6 months. Results: The results showed a decreased number of exacerbations (by 41%) in the group of patients treated with NAC and standard treatment: 46 patients had at least one exacerbation as compared with 63 patients of the group treated with standard therapy alone. Also the number of the patients with two or more exacerbations was lower in the NAC group (26%) than in the standard-therapy group (49%). The number of sick days was less (82) in the NAC group as compared with the standard-therapy group (155). There was a small but significant improvement in FEV₁ and MEF₅₀ in the NAC group. NAC once a day was well tolerated. There were no differences in the number of side effects reported in both groups. Conclusions: These data confirm results of previous studies which reported a reduction in the number of exacerbations in patients having moderate to severe COPD treated with the antioxidant NAC. Further, the once-daily formulation is well tolerated and is likely to improve patient compliance with the prescribed regimen.

No abstract

The aim of this randomized, open, parallel group study was to compare the clinical efficacy of formoterol dry powder capsule 12 micrograms b.i.d. and salmeterol dry powder 50 micrograms b.i.d. in the treatment of patients with reversible obstructive airways disease. The 6-month treatment was preceded by a 2 week run-in period. Morning pre-dose peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last 7 days of treatment was the primary variable. Throughout the study, patients recorded morning and evening pre-dose PEF, use of rescue medication, respiratory symptoms and adverse events. Clinic visits were scheduled at monthly intervals. Of the 482 patients randomized (equal numbers in the two treatment groups), 428 completed the study. Four hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the efficacy analysis for the primary variable. For mean morning pre-dose PEF during the last 7 days of treatment, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment contrast formoterol minus salmeterol was included entirely in the pre-defined range of equivalence (CI limits = -8.69, +9.841 min-1). This was also the case for the morning PEF during the last week before each clinic visit. For mean evening pre-dose PEF, the estimated treatment contrasts showed a trend towards superiority of formoterol over salmeterol, which became statistically significant at 2, 3 and 4 months (P < 0.05; estimated contrasts 7.27, 10.45 and 10.511 min-1, respectively). No treatment group differences were found in use of rescue medication and respiratory symptom scores. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. These findings demonstrate that formoterol 12 micrograms b.i.d. and salmeterol 50 micrograms b.i.d., both formulated as dry powders, have similar long-term efficacy and safety profiles in patients with reversible obstructive airways disease.

No abstract

The most recent guidelines define COPD in a multidimensional way, nevertheless the diagnosis is still linked to the limitation of airflow, usually measured by the reduction in the FEV1/FVC ratio below 70%. However, the severity of obstruction is not directly correlated to symptoms or to invalidity determined by COPD. Thus, besides respiratory function, COPD should be evaluated based on symptoms, frequency and severity of exacerbations, patient’s functional status and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Therapy is mainly aimed at increasing exercise tolerance and reducing dyspnea, with improvement of daily activities and HRQoL. This can be accomplished by a drug-induced reduction of pulmonary hyperinflation and exacerbations frequency and severity. All guidelines recommend bronchodilators as baseline therapy for all stages of COPD, and long-acting inhaled bronchodilators, both beta-2 agonist (LABA) and antimuscarinic (LAMA) drugs, are the most effective in regular treatment in the clinically stable phase. The effectiveness of bronchodilators should be evaluated in terms of functional (relief of bronchial obstruction and pulmonary hyperinflation), symptomatic (exercise tolerance and HRQoL), and clinical improvement (reduction in number or severity of exacerbations), while the absence of a spirometric response is not a reason for interrupting treatment, if there is subjective improvement in symptoms. Because LABA and LAMA act via different mechanisms of action, when administered in combination they can exert additional effects, thus optimizing (i.e. maximizing) sustained bronchodilation in COPD patients with severe airflow limitation, who cannot benefit (or can get only partial benefit) by therapy with a single bronchodilator. Recently, a fixed combination of ultra LABA/LAMA (indacaterol/glycopyrronium) has shown that it is possible to get a stable and persistent bronchodilation, which can help in avoiding undesirable fluctuations of bronchial calibre.