The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force reviewed the current rules for scoring respiratory events in the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring and Sleep and Associated Events to determine if revision was indicated. The goals of the task force were (1) to clarify and simplify the current scoring rules, (2) to review evidence for new monitoring technologies relevant to the scoring rules, and (3) to strive for greater concordance between adult and pediatric rules. The task force reviewed the evidence cited by the AASM systematic review of the reliability and validity of scoring respiratory events published in 2007 and relevant studies that have appeared in the literature since that publication. Given the limitations of the published evidence, a consensus process was used to formulate the majority of the task force recommendations concerning revisions.The task force made recommendations concerning recommended and alternative sensors for the detection of apnea and hypopnea to be used during diagnostic and positive airway pressure (PAP) titration polysomnography. An alternative sensor is used if the recommended sensor fails or the signal is inaccurate. The PAP device flow signal is the recommended sensor for the detection of apnea, hypopnea, and respiratory effort related arousals (RERAs) during PAP titration studies. Appropriate filter settings for recording (display) of the nasal pressure signal to facilitate visualization of inspiratory flattening are also specified. The respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) signals to be used as alternative sensors for apnea and hypopnea detection are specified. The task force reached consensus on use of the same sensors for adult and pediatric patients except for the following: (1) the end-tidal PCO(2) signal can be used as an alternative sensor for apnea detection in children only, and (2) polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) belts can be used to monitor respiratory effort (thoracoabdominal belts) and as an alternative sensor for detection of apnea and hypopnea (PVDFsum) only in adults.The task force recommends the following changes to the 2007 respiratory scoring rules. Apnea in adults is scored when there is a drop in the peak signal excursion by ≥ 90% of pre-event baseline using an oronasal thermal sensor (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative apnea sensor, for ≥ 10 seconds. Hypopnea in adults is scored when the peak signal excursions drop by ≥ 30% of pre-event baseline using nasal pressure (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative sensor, for ≥ 10 seconds in association with either ≥ 3% arterial oxygen desaturation or an arousal. Scoring a hypopnea as either obstructive or central is now listed as optional, and the recommended scoring rules are presented. In children an apnea is scored when peak signal excursions drop by ≥ 90% of pre-event baseline using an oronasal thermal sensor (diagnostic study), PAP device flow (titration study), or an alternative sensor; and the event m...

No abstract

Characterization of excessive sleepiness is an important task for the sleep clinician, and assessment requires a thorough history and in many cases, objective assessment in the sleep laboratory. These practice parameters were developed to guide the sleep clinician on appropriate clinical use of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). These recommendations replace those published in 1992 in a position paper produced by the American Sleep Disorders Association. A Task Force of content experts was appointed by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine to perform a comprehensive review of the scientific literature and grade the evidence regarding the clinical use of the MSLT and the MWT. Practice parameters were developed based on this review and in most cases evidence based methods were used to support recommendations. When data were insufficient or inconclusive, the collective opinion of experts was used to support recommendations. These recommendations were developed by the Standards of Practice Committee and reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The MSLT is indicated as part of the evaluation of patients with suspected narcolepsy and may be useful in the evaluation of patients with suspected idiopathic hypersomnia. The MSLT is not routinely indicated in the initial evaluation and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, or in assessment of change following treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The MSLT is not routinely indicated for evaluation of sleepiness in medical and neurological disorders (other than narcolepsy), insomnia, or circadian rhythm disorders. The MWT may be indicated in assessment of individuals in whom the inability to remain awake constitutes a safety issue, or in patients with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia to assess response to treatment with medications. There is little evidence linking mean sleep latency on the MWT with risk of accidents in real world circumstances. For this reason, the sleep clinician should not rely solely on mean sleep latency as a single indicator of impairment or risk for accidents, but should also rely on clinical judgment. Assessment should involve integration of findings from the clinical history, compliance with treatment, and, in some cases, objective testing using the MWT. These practice parameters also include recommendations for the MSLT and MWT protocols, a discussion of the normative data available for both tests, and a description of issues that need further study.

pii: jc-00414-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5176 V ersion 2.2 of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events was released on July 1, 2015. The Scoring Manual Editorial Board (previously the Scoring Manual Committee) would like to call attention to the most important changes. As discussed below, there are two new major chapters providing rules for the staging of infant sleep and scoring respiratory events in home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) studies. The new chapters were approved by the AASM Board of Directors to fi ll two obvious gaps in the Scoring Manual. The Scoring Manual Editorial Board would like to emphasize that any changes in the manual are instituted after long deliberation and consultation with area content experts.Version 2.2 of the Scoring Manual, for the fi rst time, includes rules for scoring sleep studies in term infants less than two months of age. This milestone acknowledges the importance of studying sleep across the lifespan, beginning with our youngest patients. The new scoring rules address sleep staging in infants and are based on the classic infant scoring rules of Anders et al.1 Development of these new rules benefi tted from expert consultation from Madeleine Grigg-Damberger, MD, and Mark Scher, MD. One important difference between the current manual and Anders is that sleep is now classifi ed into three stages: REM, NREM and transitional, as compared to the Anders classifi cation of active, quiet and indeterminate sleep. This new classifi cation was based on the physiologic similarities between active and REM sleep, and quiet and NREM sleep. Further, it was realized that young infants have stages of sleep that manifest elements of both REM and NREM sleep; hence, the term "transitional" rather than "indeterminate." Note that respiratory events in infants should be scored using the standard AASM pediatric scoring criteria. devices and are consistent with AASM accreditation standards for HSAT. Incorporating these rules not only standardizes reporting from sleep center to sleep center, but also provides a foundation for monitoring quality metrics and patient outcomes. This chapter includes specifi c reporting parameters for newer monitoring technology such as peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT). As the number and types of HSAT devices evolve, and new technology and evidence emerge, these scoring rules will also evolve to keep pace with the dynamic HSAT landscape.Going forward, our major goals are to clarify scoring rules (by providing additional examples) and address areas of ambiguity or controversy. To this end, the Editorial Board will begin an ongoing dialog with the panel of "gold standard" reviewers of the AASM Inter-scorer Reliability (ISR) program. This will provide important feedback concerning diffi culties that arise when participants apply the scoring rules to "real life" sleep studies. Each month, we also receive thoughtful inquiries about interpretation of the current rules. Many of these questions raise interesting p...

The mechanisms by which respiratory stimuli induce arousal from sleep and the clinical significance of these arousals have been explored by numerous studies in the last two decades. Evidence to date suggests that the arousal stimulus in nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREM) is related to the level of inspiratory effort rather than the individual stimuli that contribute to ventilatory drive. A component of the arousal stimulus proportional to the level of inspiratory effort may originate in mechanoreceptors either in the upper airway or respiratory pump. Medullary centers responsible for ventilatory drive may also send a signal proportionate to the level of drive to higher centers in the brain which are responsible for arousal. Thus, the arousal stimulus may consist of multiple components, each increasing as inspiratory effort increases. The level of effort triggering arousal is an index of the arousability of the brain (arousal threshold). A deeper stage of sleep, central nervous system depressants, prior sleep fragmentation, and the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been observed to increase the arousal threshold to airway occlusion. Less information is available concerning the mechanisms of arousal from rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. While REM sleep is associated with the longest obstructive apneas in patients with OSA, normal human subjects appear to have a similar or lower arousal threshold to respiratory stimuli in REM compared to NREM sleep. Recent studies have challenged the assumption that the termination of all obstructive apnea is dependent on arousal from sleep. Improvements in methods to detect and quantitate changes in the cortical electroencephalogram (EEG) may better define the relationship between arousal and apnea termination. This may result in improved criteria for identifying EEG changes of clinical significance. While little is known concerning the mechanisms of arousal in central sleep apnea, arousal may play an important role in inducing this type of apnea in some patients.