No abstract

Mothers and fathers often disagree in their ratings of child behavior as evidenced clinically and supported by a substantial literature examining parental agreement on broadband rating scales. The present study examined mother-father agreement on DSM-based, ADHD symptom-specific ratings, as compared to agreement on broadband ratings of externalizing behavior. Using mother and father ratings from 324 children who participated in the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD, parental agreement was computed and patterns of disagreement were examined. Mother-father ratings were significantly correlated. However, a clear pattern of higher ratings by mothers compared to fathers was present across ratings. Agreement on ADHD symptom-specific ratings was significantly lower than agreement for broadband externalizing behaviors or ODD symptoms. Of several moderator variables tested, parental stress was the only variable that predicted the discrepancy in ratings. Disagreement between parents is clinically significant and may pose complications to the diagnostic process.

Objective This randomized clinical trial compared Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) treatment alone, intensive reading intervention alone, and their combination for children with ADHD and word reading difficulties and disabilities (RD). Method Children (n=216; predominantly African American males) in grades 2–5 with ADHD and word reading/decoding deficits were randomized to ADHD treatment (carefully-managed medication+parent training), reading treatment (intensive reading instruction), or combined ADHD+reading treatment. Outcomes were parent and teacher ADHD ratings and measures of word reading/decoding. Analyses utilized a mixed models covariate-adjusted gain score approach with post-test regressed onto pretest and other predictors. Results Inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity outcomes were significantly better in the ADHD (parent Hedges g=.87/.75; teacher g=.67/.50) and combined (parent g=1.06/.95; teacher g=.36/41) treatment groups than reading treatment alone; the ADHD and Combined groups did not differ significantly (parent g=.19/.20; teacher g=.31/.09). Word reading and decoding outcomes were significantly better in the reading (word reading g=.23; decoding g=.39) and combined (word reading g=.32; decoding g=.39) treatment groups than ADHD treatment alone; reading and combined groups did not differ (word reading g=.09; decoding g=.00). Significant group differences were maintained at the three- to five-month follow-up on all outcomes except word reading. Conclusions Children with ADHD and RD benefit from specific treatment of each disorder. ADHD treatment is associated with more improvement in ADHD symptoms than RD treatment, and reading instruction is associated with better word reading and decoding outcomes than ADHD treatment. The additive value of combining treatments was not significant within disorder, but the combination allows treating both disorders simultaneously.

Objective The present study examined the feasibility and effectiveness of a BPT group intervention implemented in an outpatient mental health setting in reducing child impairments and increasing parenting confidence in managing child behavior. Method Parents of 241 children with ADHD participated in the eight-session parent group program, completing the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS) and a measure of parenting confidence at the first and last session. Results Parents reported improvements in child behavior across all domains of the IRS, with the largest improvements in terms of overall impairment, parent-child relationship, and impact of child behavior on the family. Parents also reported increased confidence in managing their child's behavior. Conclusion These findings suggest that brief BPT group programs administered to a diverse range of attendees in a typical outpatient setting result in improvements in functional impairments comparable to those produced in controlled studies, as well as improved parenting confidence.