The efficacy of three gastric restriction operations were compared in a prospective randomized study of 310 morbidly obese subjects. The median patient age was 34 years (range, 18 to 62 years). They were predominantly female (13:1) and had a median pre-operative weight that was 198% of their ideal weight (range, 160% to 318%). There was an equitable dispersion of perceived risk factors between the groups under study and there were no deaths during the perioperative period. Compliance with follow-up at 3 years was 91%. When success was defined as a loss of more than 50% of excess weight or a current pregnancy, the success rates at 3 years were 17% for gastrogastrostomy, 48% for vertical gastroplasty, and 67% for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (p less than 0.001). Although the gastric bypass operation took longer to perform, there were similar outcome patterns for the three groups during the postoperative period. We conclude that the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the preferred procedure for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.
Gastric restrictive procedures for morbid obesity are frequently performed to reduce problems arising from the physical limitations and social isolation of massive obesity. Numerous reports have described changes in weight after gastric restrictive operations. yet few studies have documented changes in the secondary effects of obesity. This report deals with changes in psychosocial status and physical activity occurring in 240 patients who remained in the study 3 years after surgery. These patients were members of a group of 310 patients who were entered into a prospective randomized trial to assess the relative benefits of three forms of gastric restrictive procedure. Prior to operation, and at yearly intervals after operation, the physical activities and psychosocial status of each patient was assessed by a standardized semi‐structured interview. At the time of the three‐year interview the median weight loss for these patients was 29.5 kg which represents 53% of excess weight lost. This weight loss was associated with a marked reduction in the amount of food eaten. There was a significant increase in the number of patients smoking more than 20 cigarettes a day and a mild increase in alcohol intake. There were significant improvements in the level of self‐image and state of happiness. The social lives and sex lives of the majority of patients were improved and a significantly greater number of patients reported being in a stable emotional relationship at 3 years after operation than did so pre‐operatively. There was a marked increase in the number of patients in full‐time or part‐time employment from 38% prior to surgery to 60% at 3 years after operation. We conclude that, in association with significant weight loss after gastric restrictive procedures for morbid obesity, there is a broad improvement in physical and psychosocial factors at 3 years after opeation.
As part of the Adelaide Obesity Surgery Study, we have reviewed all patients who have undergone revisional surgery. Of the 31 0 trial patients, 63 (20%) had revisions 1-69 (median 32) months following their original surgery-30% of all 105 gastrogastrostomy (GG) operations, 22% of 106 gastroplasty (GP) procedures, and 9% of 99 gastric bypasses (GB). Failure was due to stomal dilatation, 11% of all trial patients (71% of GG revisions), stomal stenosis, 6% (52% of GP revisions) and staple dehiscence, 4%. There was no mortality and a low hospital morbidity. Long-term success was only 23% (follow-up at least 3 years) and was achieved at considerable expense (3 reversals, 10 further revisions, 44 endoscopic procedures). Revisional surgery was successful in 45% of patients with stomal dilatation or dehiscence but in only 17% with stenosis. Overall, the most successful operation was revision of, or conversion to, gastric bypass (58% success rate), compared with gastroplasty (24%) and gastrogastrostomy (25%). Our long-term results following revisional surgery were disappointing, particularly for stenosis, and most failures followed revision to GG or GP. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the procedure of choice when considering revision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.