The recent habituation literature is reviewed with emphasis on neurophysiological studies. The hindlimb flexion reflex of the acute spinal cat is used as a model system for analysis of the neuronal mechanisms involved in habituation and sensitization (i.e., dishabituation). Habituation of this response is demonstrated to follow the same 9 parametric relations for stimulus and training variables characteristic of behavioral response habituation in the intact organism. Habituation and sensitization appear to be central neural processes and probably do not involve presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition. It is suggested that they may result from the interaction of neural processes resembling "polysynaptic low-frequency depression," and "facilitatory afterdischarge." "Membrane desensitization" may play a role in long-lasting habituation.

Presented a dual-process theory of response plasticity to repeated stimulation. 2 hypothetical processes, 1 decremental (habituation) and 1 incremental (sensitization), are assumed to develop independently in the CNS and interact to yield the final behavioral outcome. Behavioral experiments are presented, using both the hindlimb flexion reflex of acute spinal cat and the acoustic startle response of intact rat, which are consistent with this theory. Neurophysiological experiments indicate that the 2 processes have separate and distinct neuronal substrates. The dual-process theory and other current theories of response habituation are evaluated in terms of these and other recent findings. (6 p. ref.)

The most commonly cited descriptions of the behavioral characteristics of habituation come from two papers published almost 40 years ago (Thompson and Spencer, 1966;Groves and Thompson, 1970). In August 2007, the authors of this review, who study habituation in a wide range of species and paradigms, met to discuss their work on habituation and to revisit and refine the characteristics of habituation. This review offers a re-evaluation of the characteristics of habituation in light of these discussions. We made substantial changes to only a few of the characteristics, usually to add new information and expand upon the description rather than to substantially alter the original point.In the 20 th century, great progress was made in understanding the behavioral characteristics of habituation. A landmark paper published by Thompson and Spencer in 1966 clarified the definition of habituation, synthesized the research to date and presented a list of nine behavioral characteristics of habituation that appeared to be common in all organisms studied The history of habituation and the historical context of Thompson & Spencer's (1966) distillation are reviewed more fully in an article by Thompson (2009) that is included in this issue. This list was repeated and expanded upon by Groves and Thompson in 1970. These two papers are now citation classics and are considered to be the authorities on the characteristics of habituation. In August 2007, a group of 15 researchers (the authors of this review) who study habituation in a wide range of species and paradigms met to revisit these characteristics and refine them based on the 40 years of research since Thompson and Spencer 1966. The descriptions and characteristics from 1966 have held up remarkably well, and the revisions we have made to them were often for clarity rather than content. We made substantial changes to only a few of the characteristics, usually to add new information and expand upon the description rather than to substantially alter the original point. We restricted ourselves to an analysis of habituation; there was insufficient time for detailed discussions of the other form of non-associative learning "sensitization." Thus this review is restricted to our discussions of habituation and dishabituation (as it relates directly to habituation).Many people will be surprised to learn that, although habituation is termed "the simplest form of learning" and is well studied behaviorally, remarkably little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying habituation. Researchers who work on this form of learning believe that because habituation allows animals to filter out irrelevant stimuli and focus selectively on

Rabbits received classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response (NMR) in a trace conditioning paradigm. In this paradigm, a 250-ms tone conditioned stimulus (CS) occurs, after which there is a 500-ms period of time in which no stimuli occur (the trace interval), followed by a 100-ms air puff unconditioned stimulus (UCS). In Experiment 1, lesions of the hippocampus or cingulate/retrosplenial cortex disrupted acquisition of the long-latency or adaptive conditioned response relative to unoperated controls and animals that received neocortical lesions that spared the cingulate/retrosplenial areas. When animals with hippocampal or cingulate/retrosplenial lesions were switched to a standard delay paradigm in which the CS and UCS were contiguous in time, they acquired in about the same number of trials as naive rabbits. In a second experiment multiple-unit activity in area CA1 of the hippocampus was examined during acquisition of the trace conditioned response (CR). Three groups of animals were tested: animals that had a 500-ms trace interval (Group T-500), animals that received explicitly unpaired presentations of the CS and UCS (Group UP), and animals that underwent conditioning with a 2,000-ms trace interval (Group T-2000). Animals in Group T-500 acquired the CR in about 500 trials. Early in training, and well before any CRs occurred, there was a substantial increase in neuronal activity in the hippocampus that began during the CS and persisted through the trace interval. There was also an increase in the UCS period that modeled the amplitude-time course of the behavioral unconditioned response. Later in conditioning as CRs emerged, there was no longer neuronal bursting throughout the CS + trace period. Rather, the activity shifted to later in the trace interval and formed a model of the amplitude-time course of the behavioral CR. Activity during the UCS period was similar to that seen earlier in conditioning. Animals in Group UP showed no behavioral conditioning and no increase in neuronal activity. Animals in Group T-2000 showed no long-latency behavioral conditioning and no increase in neuronal activity. The data are discussed in terms of the role of the hippocampus in conditioning during situations in which the CS and UCS are not contiguous in time.

Study of the neurobiology of learning and memory is in a most exciting phase. Behavioral studies in animals are characterizing the categories and properties of learning and memory; essential memory trace circuits in the brain are being defined and localized in mammalian models; work on human memory and the brain is identifying neuronal systems involved in memory; the neuronal, neurochemical, molecular, and biophysical substrates of memory are beginning to be understood in both invertebrate and vertebrate systems; and theoretical and mathematical analysis of basic associative learning and of neuronal networks in proceeding apace. Likely applications of this new understanding of the neural bases of learning and memory range from education to the treatment of learning disabilities to the design of new artificial intelligence systems.